CENSORED EVIDENCE

Tina Peters, a 69-year-old Mesa County clerk and recorder, accidentally discovered election fraud by state actors and is now in a Colorado prison with a 9-year prison sentence by the same state actors.

January 30, 2026, Colorado Court of Appeals Reopens Briefing in People vs. Peters as Peters Files New Bond Petition

January 30, 2026, (2 hr) Joe Oltmann & Mark Cook on 2020 Fallout, Ballots Raided, PLUS

January 27, 2026, The Real Reason Tina Peters is in Prison

January 26, 2026, Eric Coomer of Dominion is finally admitting the truth that Dominion first lied about

January 20, 2026 What really happened to Tina Peters today. (Do not trust Kyle Clark of Channel 9 News)

January 20, 2026, (2 min) What David Clements said about Tina Peters’ Appeal and What’s Coming

January 19, 2026, Tina Peters Assaulted

January 15, 2026, Relief? My Three Takeaways From Tina Peters Appeal

January 15, 2026 (3 min 37 sec) Judges see serious mistakes in Peters’ previous trial

January 14, 2026 (7 min) Tina Peters is a Political Prisoner

January 14, 2026 (13 min) James Wiley for SOS & Review for Tina Peters

January 14, 2026 (22 min) Mark Cook, computer expert, on vulnerabilities of our voting systems and important information excluded from Tina Peters’ trials.

January 14, 2026 (1 hr 28 min) Oral argument in Tina Peters appeal

January 12, 2026, This will Be A Very Important Week For Tina Peters and America

January 9, 2026 Coloado Governor Jared Polis Admits Tina Peters Sentence is ‘Harsh’ – Opens Door to Possible Commutation!

January 5, 2026 (4 min) Mark Cook on what Channel 9, Kyle Clark, is hiding from you

January 4, 2026 (20 min) Venezuelan Voting Machines & How Maduro Helped Rig the 2020 Election

December 28, 2025 (10 min) FBI got caught with instructions to DESTROY 2020 election fraud (See John Solomon & Tina Peters)

December 25, 2025 (3 min) Subject matter experts testify on election fraud

December 24, 2025 (less than 60 seconds) Joe Oltmann on Jena Griswold’s crimes 

December 23, 2925 Scott Bottoms on Colorado’s Secretary of State, Jena Griswold

December 21, 2025 (21 min) The Immediate Liberation of Tina Peters: A Plain Reckoning 

December 15, 2025 (9 min) Stephen Bannon with John Case, Tina Peters attorney

December 15, 2025 (8 min) President Trump Humiliates Colorado Gov. Polis Over Failed Policies & Tina Peters

December 14, 2025 (1 hr 45 min) Joe Oltmann Untamed – Mark Cook

December 13, 2025, (16 min) Tina Peters’ attorney, John Case, AND what the media censored from you

December 12, 2025, BRILLIANT: Tina Peters’ attorney Peter Ticktin shares statement on Tina’s pardon – Colorado has no right to hold her.

December 10, 2025, The Rocky Mountain Heist of Tina Peters By Colorado’s Evil Empire

December 6, 2025, Colorado’s Most Valuable Political Scalp: The Cruel & Unusual Case of Tina Peters

November 30, 2025, (1 min 33 sec) Kari Lake on Tina Peters

November 28, 2025 – Colorado’s Clash with Federal Law: Why Tina Peters’ case poses a Supreme Court Question

November 25, 2025 (5 min 30 sec) More on Tina Peters (Why Tina Peters is the key witness to the 2020 election fraud at 4:10)

November 24, 2025 (16 min) Peter Ticktin on Tina Peters

November 23, 2025 – (8 min) Peter Ticktin audio reporting on Tina Peters’ torture in prison

November 22, 2025 – The Intelligence Briefing on Tina Peters (scan to 1 hr 47 min and listen for 18 min)

November 16, 2025 – Jack Smith may have handed Trump the Golden Key to pardon Tina Peters

Sept 25, 2025 – (2 hr) SWORN TESTIMONY OF THE VENEZUELAN SMARTMATIC WHISTLEBLOWER

 Venezuelan Whistleblower Testimony Exonerates Tina Peters

September 19, 2025 (17 min) – Mike Davis: Tina Peters is a great American wrongfully persecuted by  Colorado Lawfare Democrats

September 25, 2025 (2 hr 18 min) SWORN Testimony of the Venezuelan Smartmatic Whistleblower

Tina Peters Classical Case:
– Catch Election Fraud (Read 2-page Executive Summary of Report #3 at LINK – Tinapeters.us or LINK – Mesamadness.com)
– Her speech is now dangerous
– Go To prison for 9 years to censor her
(1 hr) LINK https://rumble.com/v6x3vka-its-all-about-tina-peters-guests-peter-ticktin-and-jason-sullivan-4-august-.html

August 28, 2025 (1 hr 11 min) Tina Peters Will Be Free: County Contract Proves She Had Authority!  Peter Ticktin & Treniss Evans

Aug 21, 2025 LINK The Crucifixion of Tina Peters

Aug 13, 2025 LINK “The Intelligence Agencies Have 6 Ways From Sunday For Getting Back At you” – Just Ask Tina Peters

X Account Updates on Tina Peters

Here’s a peek at Tina Peters’ story. Election Rule 20.5.3b permits any clerk and recorder to have anyone in their secure areas with or without any badge, just so long as the subject matter expert is constantly supervised. Tina’s team did that. But Tina’s defense was censored 39 times by Judge Matthew Barrett. Prosecution attorney, Robert Shapiro, argued using Election Rule 20.5.3a and implied Tina should have used only the county’s professional help instead, just as Colorado’s SOS email mandated. Tina tried that, but her IT team refused.

As a fact, Texas rejected Dominion Voting System because Dominion’s software was not “safe from fraudulent and unauthorized manipulation” per Deputy Secretary of State, Jose A Esparza, and signed on January 24, 2020. Tina knew nothing of this, but accidently discovered election manipulation and reported it. Just read the 2-page executive summary of Mesa County Report #3. (See mesamadness.com or tinapeters.us) Unauthorized databases had been created and not all votes were transferred into them and there’s even more evidence of fraud. No one has been held accountable yet.

When Tina Peters reported this to her county commissioners, Colorado’s Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, accused Tina of releasing a bios password. Actually, it was a redacted old bios password before it was posted online and then deleted via the secretary of state (SOS) software upgrade called “Trusted Build.” Tina’s jury never heard this. Then later we learned that Colorado’s SOS released 664 bios passwords for months without any penalty. Her announced fix, “We’ve changed the passwords.” Why wasn’t that suggested when Tina was accused of releasing just one old bios password that wasn’t going to be used anyway?

Who broke Colorado’s election laws?

Does this look like a Brady violation? This comes from a 1963 Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, which said withholding exculpatory evidence violates the defendant’s right to a fair trial. Should Judge Matthew Barrett, District Attorney Daniel Rubinstein, or Prosecution Attorney Robert Shapiro continue to practice law anywhere? Should they be incarcerated for their wicked lawfare against an innocent clerk who was doing her job to save all election records?

Jearell Kelley, PE & Former Technical Consultant to the US Space Force (retired)

Nation-State Vulnerability Expert, Jeff Lenberg, shows how Level 3 Election fraud (software-driven) is growing in other states

More on Tina Peters is found under The Real News tab at CensoredEvidence.org.

By Jearell C. Kelley, PE & Former Technical Consultant to the US Space Force (retired)
jerry.kelley428@gmail.com

When truth stumbles, justice is driven back. The Lord looked and was appalled no one intervened.
Selections from Isaiah 59:14-16 (NIV)

Abstract: A Colorado clerk and recorder (a Christian grandmother without a traffic ticket) has been in a Colorado jail for over a year (since Oct 3, 2024) for accidentally discovering Level 3 Election Fraud (software-driven) by state actors, Dominion Voting Systems, and immediately reporting it to her county commissioners. State actors, guilty of this fraud, then framed her with fake charges. Please help secure her freedom and justice while protecting your votes and money. Yes, Colorado property taxes have increased almost 3 times in some areas due to election fraud. Irrefutable scientific and Engineering evidence is now available in this paper. Both major parties are cheating in elections nationally, while this fraud grows into other states. There’s disagreement inside all parties, but who decides – insiders or We The People? What is America’s future if this growing national problem isn’t corrected?

A Special Note to Ministers:

Our Founding Fathers, motivated by biblical-political sermons, were also informed of British tyrannical abuses by their ministers, who were either members or recipients of the Committees of Correspondence. Congregations with British loyalists were also informed. The result: America’s freedoms were born. Will all this be lost if ministers remain silent on the growing godless legal and political tyrannical abuses now?  Did we forget Esther 4:1-2, 8:8-10, Psalms 94:16, Proverbs 29:7, 31:8-9, Isaiah 58:6, Jeremiah 22:16, 29:7, Ezekiel 9, Amos 5:15, 21-24, Obadiah 11, 2 Peter 3:2, or Matthew 25:44-46? Why should’t we live under godless tyranny if we substitute opinions for God’s Word? Isn’t that also idolatry? What difference would hearing early American ministers have on us? What if ministers preached like those who influenced our Founding Fathers?  Here’s a test to see who does and why it’s important. . . 

(1 min 44 sec) Professor Dave Clements to pastors

INDEX to American Tyranny
Part 1 – The Discovery
Part 2  – Legal Weapons Protecting Tyranny
Part 3 – The Evidence
Part 4 – Weaponize Fraud
Part 5 – The Initial Lie That Stuck & Your Stolen Money
Part 6 – A Personal Question and our Christian Founding Fathers’ Advice
Part 7 – Fake Charges
Part 8 – Our Future
Part 9 – Action Items

PART 1 – The Discovery

Early in 2021, a Colorado election clerk and recorder began receiving complaints of election issues from her local citizens. Their neighborhood canvassing efforts found “voters” who did not live at the registered addresses. These would be called phantom voters. Still, the clerk believed that Colorado was the Gold Standard in elections, just as the Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, publicly stated. However, when the “winners” of the Grand Junction April 2021 Municipal Election reported their “wins” and “winning margins” before she publicly posted them, she immediately knew something wasn’t right. How did they know before she did, especially before she made it public?

Then, in April 2021, this clerk got an email from Colorado’s Secretary of State (SOS) about an upcoming software upgrade called “Trusted Build.” She knew QR codes were needed for election audits and learned from David Stahl, a Dominion employee, that the upcoming “Trusted Build” would delete these codes. She then contacted the SOS’s office, and it was again confirmed that the “Trusted Build” would delete these codes, making the recent past elections (Mesa County November 2020 General and Grand Junction Municipal 2021 Elections) impossible to audit/verify. Per Colorado statutory law (CRS 1-7-802), she was required to save election records for twenty-five months and for twenty-two months per federal law (52 U.S.C. 20701). Since she was only six months away from the November 2020 election, she asked her IT department for help with the Election Management System (EMS) server backup, but they declined.

It was later learned that some county employees (Sheila Reiner and Bobbie Gross) were also Dominion employees. Should citizens be concerned about mixed loyalties? Would these county employees protect the citizens’ votes or Dominion’s reputation if election questions were raised? Were other county employees suspicious of the questionable activities of some within their department, and wanted to minimize their involvement, or did they lack the technical skills for the server backup?

PART 2 – Legal Weapons Protecting Tyranny

There was nothing illegal in this process of saving EMS server data. Griswold’s Deputy Secretary of State, Christopher Beall, admitted in testimony in another case that making forensic images of the EMS server was not prohibited by law. (1) Judge Barrett excluded all of this from the clerk’s jury. During the Colorado 2022 Regular Session, bill SB22-153, titled “Internal Election Security Measures,” supported by Stephen Fenberg, Kevin Priola, and Susan Lontine, was passed. Section 11 now makes it illegal to perform a full EMS backup, even though it had always been legal before. When the public sees what is hidden from them, they will understand the reason for this legislative manipulation.

The clerk asked the SOS’s office if members of the public could witness the “Trusted Build” process. Their answer was adamant that only Dominion employees, her county employees, and the SOS office staff could witness the “Trust Build” installation in person. They made it clear that if any other person was present, they would simply go on to the next county to install the “Trusted Build.” This was in conflict with Election Rule 20.5.3(b), which permits clerks and records to have any outside technical help that the county may be lacking, as long as they are supervised. The SOS’s office recommendation was that the county’s security cameras would be adequate for later public observation. However, the clerk knew that the cameras did not provide the needed resolution to see what was actually happening on the computer monitors during the “Trusted Build” software upgrade.

With unanswered election questions and anomalies, the SOS office’s denial of full public transparency, the unnecessary limitation of qualified subject matter experts from observing, which was in conflict with Election Rule 20.5.3(b), and with knowledge that Jena Griswold’s email instructions were in violation of federal and Colorado statutory laws to preserve all election records, things did not seem right, so the clerk began looking for outside technical help who could be hired as a county employee. Gerald Wood was the first outside computer consultant the clerk vetted for the needed technical service. He went through the process of becoming a Mesa County employee, complete with a background check and getting a security badge, just as Griswold wanted. Somewhere along the process, Wood claimed he didn’t have the necessary skills. This forced the clerk to look for another expert, but time was running out. The SOS’s software upgrade team was coming soon.

Conan Hayes became the technical substitute, complete with a government security clearance, which required a background check, and was able to fully save all election records before and after the “Trusted Build” process. (Prosecution attorney, Robert Shapiro, and the media described Hayes as just a surfer. Neither Hayes nor the following experts were permitted in the clerk’s trial.) It was then sent to three subject matter experts with 40 years or more each (Doug Gould with cybersecurity, Jeffrey O’Donnell with database analysis, and Dr. Walter Daugherity with computer skills). All returned reports had evidence of serious election crimes by top state actors and Dominion Voting Systems. The clerk forwarded these reports to her county commissioners (Janet Rowland, Cody Davis, and Scott McGuiness). They immediately had a secret meeting with Dominion’s CEO, John Poulos, and extended Dominion’s contract to 2029. Are any of them on Dominion’s payroll?

PART 3 -The Evidence

Mesa County Forensic Report #3 showed that unauthorized databases had been created and not all votes had been transferred into them. Votes that were “transferred” could not be confirmed to have the original voter’s intentions either. Votes left behind got deleted. This happened twice. Once in Mesa County’s 2020 General Election and again in Grand Junction’s April 2021 Municipal Election. Fraud of this nature permits insiders to design any election results they want. There is no way to override the system with massive votes on any issue to win with this manipulation design. All forensic reports are available for the public via the following websites: https://handcountroadshow.org/; https://mesamadness.com/; or https://www.censoredevidence.org/. The “Election Projects” files, which were to be saved according to the SOS’s email instructions to all Colorado county clerks and recorders, only contained instructions to save the unauthorized databases. Judge Barrett censored all of this from the clerk’s jury, and they found the clerk guilty for not following the SOS’s orders. Dominion Voting Systems is used in 60 of Colorado’s 64 counties.

***
A sidebar on Dominion Voting Systems Vulnerabilities:

The clerk didn’t know, but Texas had rejected Dominion Voting Systems in January of 2020. Texas’ Deputy Secretary of State, Jose A. Esparza, wrote, Dominion was not “safe from fraudulent and unauthorized activity.” This rejection by Texas occurred after Dominion was “certified by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) on January 30, 2019.” We can now ignore “certifications” from the EAC on voting equipment. They do not mean anything. (See Texas’ letter under the States tab at CensoredEvidence.org) Other experts have testified against the EAC, too.

A sidebar on computer voting machines’ vulnerabilities:

A) On November 7, 1988, a New Yorker article titled, Counting Votes, author Ronnie Dugger reported, “Wallis Ware, a Rand Corporation computer specialist, warned those attending a 1987 conference on the security of computer-tabulated elections, ‘There is probably a Chernobyl or Three Mile Island waiting to happen in some election.’ And added, ‘Computers can transfer votes from one candidate to another in accordance to a specified percentage spread. . . All computer experts I have spoken with agree that no computer program can be made completely secure against fraud.’”

B) Then on December 13, 2004 before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee Public Hearings on Election Irregularities, Clinton Curtis was asked, “ Curtis are there programs that can be used to secretly fix elections?”

Curtis replied, “Yes.”

The Committee Person then asked, “How do you know that to be the case?”

Curtis answered, “Because in October of 2000, I wrote a prototype for the present Congressman Tom Feeny at the company I worked for in Oviedo, Florida, that did just that.”

The Committee Person followed up with: “And would that program you designed be something election officials could detect?”

Curtis answered: “They would never see it.”

(Go to the 19-minute 34-second point in the free documentary Selection Code to see and hear Clinton Curtis’ above testimony. This documentary may be found at CensoredEvidence.org in the Censored Documentary box on the homepage.)

C) In 2018, the National Academy of Sciences, in a “Consensus Study Report,” stated:

• Election tallies and reporting may … be affected by malicious actors.
• Malware – malicious software that includes worms, spyware, viruses, Trojan horses, and ransomware is perhaps the greatest threat to electronic voting.
• Malware can be introduced at any point in the electronic path of a vote, from software behind the vote-casting interface to the software tabulating votes … to prevent a voter’s vote from being recorded as intended.
• Malware can also be used to disrupt auditing software.
• There is no realistic mechanism to fully secure vote casting and tabulation computer systems from cyber threats.
• Complicated and technology-dependent voting systems increase the risk of and opportunity for malicious manipulation.

A sidebar on military computers’ vulnerabilities:

Military & Aerospace once advertised for an April 2021 cybersecurity seminar with one class titled: Why we’ll never keep the bad guys out. If our “secure” military computers can be hacked, why not our voting machines that do not even come close to military security standards? Answer: They are, and by both major parties. See the evidence captured at CensoredEvidenc.org. Signed – Jearell C. Kelley, PE & former technical consultant to the US Space Force (retired).

The fraud this clerk found is spreading to other states. See Nation State Vulnerability Expert, Jeff Lenberg, link in the Censored Documentaries box on the homepage at CensoredEvidence.org.

***

Other Evidence of Election Fraud Sources:

• Read the 2-page Executive Summary of Mesa County Forensic Report #3 found at tinapeters.us, and select the “Reports/Filings” tab; Or https://handcountroadshow.org, select “Get Educated” tab, the “Colorado” box, then “Mesa County Reports;” Or https://mesamadness.com/; Or https://www.censoredevidence.org and select the “Colorado” box under “States” tab.
• Watch the free documentary “Let My People Go” found in the “Censored Documentaries” box on the homepage at CensoredEvidence.org.
• See the free documentary “Selection Code” found in the upper tab at tinapeters.us or go to the Censored Documentaries box on the homepage at CensoredEvidence.org.
• See postings under “Categories 1,” “States,” and “The Real News” tabs at CensoredEvidence.org for more evidence of electronic election fraud.

PART 4 – Weaponize Fraud

On the morning of the “Trusted Build,” May 25, 2021, Dominion was already at work by 8 am when the clerk arrived. She wanted to capture screen images to show her consultant, Conan Hayes, to ensure he was fully informed about the actions already in progress. Somehow, those images, but with redacted passwords, got posted, but not by the clerk. Griswold accused the clerk of doing this anyway. The “leaked BIOS passwords” never happened, but were the false catalyst that led the FBI to raid the clerk’s and others’ homes, resulting in arrests of those who had been asking questions about the election and who were involved in the canvassing effort of finding phantom voters. The FBI seized numerous computers, cell phones, removable storage devices, and iPads from everyone. Sherronna Bishop’s front door was destroyed in the FBI’s surprise morning attack. The clerk reported, “This had an abusive and chilling effect of intimidating individuals who would associate with my effort to question the integrity and transparency of elections and to advocate for reform of election laws.”

***

A sidebar on leaked BIOS passwords and other “accidents”:

BIOS stands for Basic Input Output System. There are multiple passwords associated with voting systems. The so-called leaked BIOS passwords were old passwords that were to be replaced with new ones after the “Trusted Build” anyway. The prosecution attorney, Robert Shapiro, and Judge Matthew Barrett did not permit the clerk’s jury to see the supposedly computer-generated images of “online leaked BIOS passwords” because they had been redacted. They couldn’t be read. Journalist Rachel Alexander, of the Arizona Sun Times, posted on her X account, dated August 15, 2024, “The judge excluded much of her defense as ‘not relevant.’ Wasn’t allowed to delve into her concerns about the voting machine tabulators. That’s no different than a Stalin show trial where only the prosecution gets to put on a case.”

Then months later, it was discovered that Griswold’s office had released 664 BIOS passwords online, compromising voting equipment in multiple counties for four to six months from about April to October 2024. Griswold’s response was, “There is no risk posed by this security lapse.” If it doesn’t pose a security risk, why did Griswold accuse the clerk of this in one county over the alleged release BIOS passwords that really were redacted and couldn’t be read anyway? Why did Griswold’s “fix” to change BIOS passwords not come up when the clerk was accused?

Griswold also said her office’s leak, “This was a mistake.” But was it? White hat hacker Clay Parikh said that if a hacker had access to the BIOS passwords, they could create tools to get back inside, even after the BIOS passwords were changed, and then do anything they want to change election results. He added that since Dominion Voting Systems is used in other states, this created backdoors for hackers that could have had a fraudulent impact on the 2024 election nationwide.

This wasn’t the first time Griswold’s office played the “this-was-a-mistake” card. They said the same when caught mailing postcards to approximately 30,000 illegals with reminders to register to vote in 2022. Before this, her office attempted to exclude Trump from the Colorado ballot altogether.

***

Griswold demanded that the clerk recant her public statements about the voting equipment with Election Order 2022-01. District Attorney (DA) Dan Rubinstein initiated lawfare against the clerk after she refused, resulting in her losing her county-elected position. This would be just the beginning of Rubinstein’s harassment. The clerk’s husband was in an assisted living facility because of Parkinson’s Disease and early onset of dementia. Then she got a call from her husband, who said he had signed a paper he didn’t know what it was, and asked her to call their attorney for help. He had signed papers removing her as the Power of Attorney over her husband. She called their attorney, but he declined to help them because he had received a warning from Rubenstein. She was not permitted to see her husband again. Later, her husband passed away.

Yet, the clerk’s attorney, John Case, made the court aware in his brief that DA Dan Rubinstein did not investigate Griswold’s destruction of election records during the “Trusted Build” installation, which “shows his bias for Griswold and animus against Peters.” (2) Does any of this testify to the professionalism of the district attorney or judge, or even basic curiosity to understand the full problem, or was it all vindictive, related to their friend’s political positions? The Clerk’s jury never heard any of this. A subsequent judge, Varholak, said this case was complicated. But is it really?

Judge Matthew Barrett censored the clerk’s defense at least 39 times as “irrelevant,” while focusing on the fake charges, with not one word about election fraud. With the jury’s confused decision and its average age barely that of a college graduate —if that —the jury was not of the clerk’s peers. Judge Barrett then sentenced this clerk, age 69, with absolutely no violent criminal history or evidence of flight risk, to nine years in prison because he believed her speech was dangerous. He said, “You are a charlatan and you cannot help but lie as easy as it is for you to breathe… Every effort to undermine the integrity of our elections and the public’s trust in our institutions has been made by you.” (3)

Why was Judge Barrett permitted to talk about elections in his closing remarks, but the clerk and her defense were restricted from even mentioning it?  Oh, yes, he had to protect us from her lies. Isn’t this a Constitutional violation of her Freedom of Speech? Should this judge, with his bias, be permitted to practice law? Who’s next to have their Constitutional rights violated by him with his preconceptions that clearly do not follow the scientific and computer engineering evidence? He is not stupid. He, too, has had access to the forensic reports that experts have NEVER debunked, only attorneys have attempted, yet he lied by saying, “And every time it gets refuted, every time it’s shown to be false, just another tale is weaved.” Is this judge more concerned with political connections than truth? He is either extremely naive to trust attorneys over experts, or he is THE LIAR for political reasons.

Rachel Alexander, of The Arizona Sun Times, noted the courtroom’s postings of Signal chat screenshots showed Wood was part of the plan in some way. It was apparent that a deal was made between some of the clerk’s staff and Wood, granting them immunity from prosecution in exchange for their testimonies against the clerk. (4)

PART 5 – The Initial Lie That Stuck & Your Stolen Money

The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him.
Proverbs 18:17 (NIV)

When Jena Griswold learned the clerk had given the forensic reports to the Mesa County Commissioners, Griswold initiated a press release on January 18, 2022 stating, “Clerk Peters’ actions constituted one of the nation’s first insider threats where an official, elected to uphold free, fair, and secure selections risked the integrity of the election system in an effort to prove unfounded conspiracy theories.” When independent subject-matter experts from both major parties testify with empirical, verifiable evidence of election fraud, we are not talking about conspiracy theories but scientific facts. Jena Griswold is lying.

I’ve purposely kept this clerk’s name classified till now. Why? If Tina Peters is mentioned, the public is immediately angered due to the published lies against her. They immediately terminate any discussion with their programmed media-promoted biases against Tina and remain stupid. Their ignorance will keep this innocent lady in prison while their votes and money are continuously stolen from them by the insider state actors manipulating our elections.

Massive Electronic Election Fraud is also Stealing Money from Citizens:

Mathematician Edward Solomon discovered this year (2025) that Arapahoe, Colorado’s third-largest county, had over 350,000 Republican and Democratic voters voting in exact synchronization on Amendment B, the Gallagher Amendment, to remove the property tax cap in the November 2020 election. (See the first graph.) How real is this? When it was brought to the Arapahoe County clerk and recorder’s attention this year, the Republican votes were illegally changed to match El Paso Republican votes, who rejected this (voted “no” at a 55 to 65% average rate, as the second graph shows. (A “no” vote in the range of 40 to 45% on the first graph also says that the voters voted “yes” in the range of 55 to 60% to repeal the tax cap. This is determined by the formula “one minus the percentage of the opposite vote position.” The only exception would be for those who didn’t vote on this issue at all, but all other ballot choices. This would most likely be a very small percentage of those who voted. So the formula is close to the actual value of how all voted. Reference: See the third link titled: “Colorado Taxes have increased, because votes were stolen, then changed to hide the fraud” in the Colorado box under States tab at CensoredEvidence.org.) What is actually happening is not the counting of votes as the ballots are received, but a software algorithm processing toward an insider-designed vote goal. Future AI will make this most difficult to catch. We must remove electronic voting and use hand-counted paper ballots.

PART 6 – A Personal Question & Our Christian Founding Fathers’ Advice

Would you have risked your life, business relationships, or offending others in your church by opposing slavery or protecting Jews during the holocaust? Most think they would. These were all politically controversial and based on lies, with real potential for death and losses for anyone speaking out on both issues. Only a minority spoke out, while others cowered in fear. You now know what you would have done if you remain silent on Tina Peters and the fraud she accidentally caught. Today, many are cowardly silent. They include politicians in both parties, radio stations, county political party chairs, local press, sheriffs, district attorneys, ministers, and others. Tyrants are winning because many are living as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn advised against in his famous essay “Live Not by Lies.” Google it, get smart, and pass the word. Our elections will only be fixed when citizens know of this growing national election fraud problem and help others understand it. Trump alone cannot fix this. Each is a state issue. Otherwise, America will see more prosecution of the innocent because they do not belong to the inner top-party members of Democrats and Republicans. Then Solzhenitsyn’s hell will be fully established in America with its form of communist-like controls by insider party members, with benefits to those who agree with them and punishment to all others. Our Founding Fathers would have agreed.

Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people. – John Adams

A popular government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both. – James Madison

A nation of well-informed men who have been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them cannot be enslaved. It is in the region of ignorance that tyranny begins. – Benjamin Franklin

No People will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. – Samuel Adams

PART 7 – Fake Charges

We will address each one, starting with their original descriptions in the Mesa County Grand Jury Indictment in the People of the State of Colorado v. Tina Peters and Belinda Kinsley, Defendants. Grand Jury Case: 21CR100, dated April 20, 2022.

Count 1: ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE A PUBLIC SERVANT, C.R.S. 18-8-306 (F4)

On or about April 23 – May 18, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters and Belinda Knisely, unlawfully and feloniously attempted to influence Jessi Romero of the Colorado Department of State/Secretary of State’s Office, a public servant, by means of deceit, with the intent thereby to alter or affect the public servant’s decision, vote, opinion, or action concerning matter which was to be considered or performed by the public servant or the agency or body of which the public servant was a member in violation of section 18-8-306, C.R.S.

Everything looks so professional and legal, but do you understand specifically what the illegal actions of Peters or Knisely were? Of course not. This pattern of vagueness is in all the following charges. How was Jessi Romero unlawfully and feloniously influenced to make what unlawful decision or action? Being obscure with accusations is not only against common legal practice of notifying the defendant of the specific charges so they can prepare a proper defense, as defined in both state and federal Supreme Court decisions, as Peters’ attorney, John Case, pointed out, but it also hides the fake, made-up characteristics of these charges from the public. So, let’s add in the details.

Jessi Romero was a member of Jena Griswold’s software upgrade team. He saw Conan Hayes wearing Gerald Wood’s county-employee badge and mistakenly thought Conan Hayes was a county employee. There was nothing unlawful or felonious about this, but it influenced Romero to continue with the “Trusted Build” process and not worry that a subject-matter expert was observing him.  Only Jena Griswold’s team was fooled. Their plan was not to perform a software upgrade when a non-county employee (subject matter expert) was watching. Colorado citizens should ask why Griswold was so adamant about keeping her team’s actions secret. No state laws were broken because subject matter experts could be permitted per Election Rule 20.5.3(b), with or without a badge, just as long as they are supervised by a county employee, as Tina’s team did. Prosecution attorney, Robert Shapiro, purposely ignored Election Rule 20.5.3(b) while citing Election Rule 20.5.3(a) during the trial, which requires county employees, as a first option. Prosecution invented this offense by ignoring the “b” rule, which allows exceptions. District Attorney Daniel Rubinstein and prosecuting attorney Janet Drake of Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser’s office were also present in court and agreed to this injustice and twisting of the law by their court’s silence. This and the following indictments failed to explain the details because they were permitted by Election Rule 20.5.3(b).

Jury Ruling: Peters was convicted.  Yes, Peters’ expert Hayes fooled Romero by wearing Gerald Wood’s new county badge.  Only Griswold’s team demanded that only county employees be included in the “Trusted Build,” which violated Election Rule 20.5.3(b), but neither Peters’ jury nor the public learned this. Tina was not required by any law to identify who she asked for help to the Secretary of State or anyone.

COUNT 2: ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE A PUBLIC SERVANT, C.R.S. 18-8-306 (F4)

On or about May 10 – May 19, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters and Belinda Knisley, unlawfully and feloniously attempted to influence David Underwood of Mesa County, a public servant, by means of deceit, with the intent thereby to alter or affect the public servant’s decision, vote, opinion, or action concerning a matter which was to be considered or performed by the public servant or the agency or body of which the public servant was a member; in violation of section 18-8-306, C.R.S.

David Underwood, a Mesa County employee, was directed by Peters and/or Belinda to make a county badge for Gerald Wood. Wood agreed to secure this badge for another, per John Case’s (Peters’ attorney) legal brief, the jury never heard. Wood was hesitant to answer questions in court, and, as you will see, the jury rejected Wood’s testimony of non-involvement. Conan Hayes was not required to wear a named badge per Election Rule 20.5.3(b), but it was necessary to deceive Griswold’s team into believing that a county employee, not an outside subject-matter expert, was watching their “Trust Build” process. Hayes, a cybersecurity expert with a security clearance, had been involved in the take-down of criminal cartels and was also hunted by them. Hayes wanted his identity protected. It was not illegal to have the security cameras turned off, but it was highly unusual, leading the jury and the public to believe Peters’ actions were nefarious. They never learned about Hayes or his need for a classified identity, other than that he was just a surfer. You can thank wicked prosecution and lazy, ignorant, and likely politically biased journalists for this confusion.

Who was injured in this process – the People of Colorado or Griswold and her team? If undercover FBI agents are permitted to disguise themselves in catching criminals, what law was broken by Peters’ team? ANSWER: none.

Jury Ruling: Peters was convicted. The jury and public never heard about Election Rule 20.5.3(b), Hayes’ professional details, or why the security cameras were turned off, which did not break any laws. (5)

COUNT 3: ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE A PUBLIC SERVANT, C.R.S. 18-8-306

On or about May 17, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Belinda Knisley, unlawfully and feloniously attempted to influence Stephanie Wenholtz of the Mesa Conty Clerk and Recorder’s Office, a public servant, by means of deceit, with the intent thereby to alter or affect the public servant’s decision, vote, opinion, or action concerning a matter which was to be considered or performed by the public servant or the agency or body of which the public servant was a member in violation of section 18-8-306, C.R.S.

It is not at all clear what unlawful attempted influence Knisley had on Wenholtz. It isn’t specified. Belinda Knisley pleaded guilty to trespassing, first-degree official misconduct, and violation of duty, all misdemeanors for testifying against Tina Peters in exchange for having her federal charges removed.

COUNT 4: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT CRIMINAL IMPERSONATION – CAUSE LIABILITY, C.R.S. 18-5-1-113(1)(B)(I_ AND 18-2-201 (F6)

On or about April 23 – May 19, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters and Belinda Knisley, with the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of their crime of Criminal Impersonation, unlawfully and feloniously agreed with the other co-defendant named above, Sandra Brown and/or a person or persons to the Grand Jury and District Attorney unknown that one or more of them would engage in conduct which constituted that crime or an attempt to commit that crime, or agreed to aid the other person or person in the planning or commission or attempted commission of that crime, and an overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy was committed by one or more of the conspirators; in violation of sections 18-5-113(1)(b)(I) and 18-2-201, C.R.S.

Notice carefully that the “crime” or “overt act” is not clearly specified. Tina’s attorney, Mr. Case’s legal brief explained that this indictment fails to give the needed details. He speculates that it appears to be related to Hayes use of Wood’s access badge again. Is this saying that Tina Peters permitting Conan Hayes to use Woods’ badge was an attempt to impersonate Gerald Wood?

Journalist Rachel Alexander reported that Kristi Passarelli, in Maricopa County, was caught on video using her badge to allow employee Brian Ramirez access to an election server room in 2022. Ramirez also used the badge of another employee, Charles Cooley. Neither Passarelli nor Ramirez nor Cooley was prosecuted or disciplined. When this author volunteered to observe the El Paso County 2020 General Election process in their secure election-ballot counting room, I did not have a badge but was constantly supervised. It was a common practice for outside consultants to be admitted into the election’s secure area during non-voting periods, as the “Trusted Build” timeframe occurred, when Conan Haze visited it. Election Rule 20.5.3(b) does not require specifically named badges. But they must be supervised as Tina’s team did. None of this information was permitted in Tina’s trial by Judge Matthew Barrett.

Question: Who was harmed, Colorado citizens or SOS, Jena Griswold, and Dominion Voting Systems?

Jury Ruling: Peters was convicted because the jury never heard the above Peters’ defense.

COUNT 5: ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE A PUBLIC SERVANT, C.R.S. 18-8-306 (F4)

On or about May 25, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters, unlawfully and feloniously attempted to influence Danny Casias of the Colorado Department of State/Secretary of state’s Office, a public servant, by means of deceit, with the intent thereby to alter or affect the public servant’s decision, vote, opinion, or action concerning a matter which was to be consider or performed by the public servant or the agency or body of which the public servant was a member; in violation of section 18-8306, C.R.S.

Danny Casias is the named public servant from Griswold’s office. If Casias saw Conan Hayes wearing Gerold Wood’s badge, he would have thought this was a Mesa County employee and would have continued with “The Trusted” build process. Griswold’s office staff were alert for non-county employees. They did not want outside subject matter experts watching them. They would immediately go to the next county in “The Trusted” build process if they suspected an expert was observing them. This matches all the other phony “ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE A PUBLIC SERVANT” claims listed above.

Question: Who was harmed, Colorado citizens or SOS, Jena Griswold, and Dominion Voting Systems?

Jury Ruling: Peters was convicted because the jury never heard of Peters’ defense above.

NOTE: The above three felony charges of ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE A PUBLIC SERVANT of Jessi Romero, David Underwood, and Danny Casias by Tina Peters gave Judge Matthew Barrett an excuse to sentence Peters to 8.5 years in prison. Why, when Election Rule 20.5.3(b) permits clerks and recorders to have needed subject matter experts, without specifically named badges, just as long as they are supervised? Are these real felony offenses?

COUNT 6: CRIMINAL IMPERSONATION – CAUSE LIABILITY, C.R.S 18-5-113(1)(B)(I) (F6)

On or about May 23 – May 27, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters, unlawfully, feloniously, and knowingly assumed a false or fictitious identity or capacity, legal or other, namely: Gerald “Jerry” Wood, and in such identity or capacity performed an act that, if done by the person falsely impersonated, might have subjected such person to an action or special proceeding, civil criminal, or to liability, charge, forfeiture, or penalty; in violation of section 18-5-113(1)(b)(I), C.R.S.

Tina’s attorney, Mr. Case, pointed out that this indictment fails to give the needed details. It seems to be related to Hayes’ use of Wood’s access badge and asks, “What was the liability to Mr. Wood when they were using it like a hotel key to permit a subject matter expert to get inside the election secure area and observe the ‘Trusted Build’?”

Question: Who was harmed, Colorado citizens or SOS, Jena Griswold, and Dominion Voting Systems?

Jury Ruling: Not guilty. Apparently, the jury rejected Wood’s claim that his badge was used without his permission, as was evident in the court display of his screen chats with Tina’s team.

COUNT 7: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT CRIMINAL IMPERSONATION – CAUSE LIABILITY, C.R.S. 18-5-113(1)(B)(I) AND 18-2-201 (F6)

On or about May 18 – May 27, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peter with the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the crime of Criminal Impersonation, unlawfully and feloniously agreed with Sandra Brown and/or a person or persons to the Grand Jury and District Attorney unknown that one or more of them would engage in conduct which constituted that crime or an attempt to commit that crime, or agreed to aid the other person or persons in the planning or commission or attempted commission of that crime, and an overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy was committed by one or more of the conspirators; in violation of sections 18-5-113(I)(b)(I) and 18-2-201. C.R.S.

Was Jerry Wood personally liable if Conan Hayes used his badge to get access into the election secure area? Not at all since, since Hayes was constantly supervised per Election Rule 20.5.3(b). Was it criminal for Tina to permit Conan Hayes to use Wood’s badge, when Election Rule 20.5.3(b) has no requirement for named badges by supervised subject matter experts inside election secure areas? ANSWER: It was not criminal, and as you saw in Count 4, journalist Rachel Alexander reported on others using badges belonging to others to gain access into secure ballot counting rooms without legal penalties following.

Question: Who was harmed and how?

Jury Ruling: Not guilty. Apparently, the jury rejected Wood’s claim that his badge was used without his permission, as was evident in the court display of his screen chats with Tina’s team.

COUNT 8: IDENTITY THEFT – USES INFORMATION TO OBTAIN THING OF VALUE, C.R.S. 18-5-902(1)(A) (F4)

On or about May 23 – May 25, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters, unlawfully, feloniously, and knowingly used the personal identifying information, financial identifying information, or financial device of Gerald “Jerry” Wood without permission or lawful authority with the intent to obtain cash, credit, property, services, or any other thing of value or to make a financial payment; in violation of section 18-5-902(1)(a), C.R.S

Tina’s attorney, Mr. Case, pointed out that the use of Gerald Wood’s badge by Conan Hayes had nothing to do with securing anything of value for Tina or others, as the law referenced in this indictment states. The jury could clearly see the mistakes in this count, that Tina did not reap any profit from this act.

Question: Who was harmed by the use of Wood’s badge, Colorado citizens or SOS, Jena Griswold, and Dominion Voting Systems?

Jury Ruling: Not guilty. Apparently, the jury rejected Wood’s claim that his badge was used without his permission, as was evident in the court display of his screen chats with Tina’s team.

COUNT 9 – FIRST DEGREE OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT, C.R.S. 18-8-404 (M2)

On or about April 23, 2021 – August 15, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters, a public servant, with intent to obtain a benefit for any person or maliciously cause harm to another, unlawfully and knowingly committed an act related to her office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of her official function and/or refrained from performing a duty imposed upon her by law and/or violated a statute or lawfully adopted rule or regulation relation to her office; in violation of section 18-8-404, C.R.S.

What was the harm caused to another? What beneficial goal was designed by and for Tina? What function imposed by law did Peters fail to perform? The average age of the jury appeared to be barely that of a college graduate, even if that. Why didn’t they ask more questions? Did they fully understand? What was the unlawful act committed by Tina?

Prosecution argued that Peters’ personal benefit was public fame at Lindell’s Cyber Symposium on television and an opportunity to ride in Mike Lindell’s private plane.

This full accusation again fails until the prosecutors can state the specific offensive details and provide evidence.

Jury ruling: Peters was convicted.

COUNT 10 – VIOLATION OF DUTY, C.R.S. 1-13-107(I) (M)

On or about April 23 – August 15, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters, was a public officer, election official, or other person upon whom any duty is imposed by this code who then violated, neglected, or failed to perform such duty or is guilty of corrupt conduct in the discharge of the same; in violation of section 1-13-107(1), C.R.S.

Prosecution is again silent and vague with this indictment. Needs to specifically describe the SOS prescribed duty Tina Peters failed to do. Colorado’s SOS orders required Tina Peters to break Colorado statutory law in preserving election records. Following the SOS orders only would have deleted all election records in violation of federal and state laws as Mesa County Forensic reports show and reported above. The duty Peters failed to perform by Griswold was to save only the unauthorized databases that were fraudulently created.

Colorado’s Secretary of State’s erasure of election data has never been brought to trial.

Question: Who was harmed, Colorado citizens or SOS, Jena Griswold, and Dominion Voting Systems?

Judge Matthew Barrett excluded all seriously questionable actions by state officials from Peters’ jury, because he was only focused on the Griswold’s accusations against Peters.

Jury Ruling: Peters was convicted

COUNT 11 – FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF SECRETARY OF STATE, C.R.S. 1-13-114 (M)

On or about April 23 – August 15, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Tina Peters, willfully interfered or willfully refused to comply with the rules of the Secretary of State or the Secretary of State’s designated agent in carrying out of the powers and duties proscribed in section 1-1-107, C.R.S., in violation of section 1-13-114, C.R.S.

The SOS requirements do not supersede Colorado statutory law. Prosecution is silent and vague with this indictment. Needs to specifically describe the SOS prescribed duty Tina Peters failed to do. Colorado’s SOS orders required Tina Peters to break Colorado statutory law in preserving election records. The duty Tina failed to perform was the erasing of election records that Colorado’s SOS had designed to be erased via the “Trusted Build,” and Tina failed to save the unauthorized and fraudulent “Election Project” files ONLY.

Question: Who was harmed, Colorado citizens or SOS, Jena Griswold, and Dominion Voting Systems?

Jury Ruling: Peters was convicted

COUNT 12 – VIOLATION 0F DUTY, C.R.S. 1-13-107(I) (M)

On or about August 9 – August 15, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Belinda Knisley, was a public officer, election official, or other person upon whom any duty is imposed by this code who then violated, neglected, or failed to perform such duty or is guilty of corrupt conduct in the discharge of the same, in violation of section 1-13-107(1), C.R.S.

Prosecution is silent and vague on the specific duty Belinda Knisley failed to perform. The SOS requirements do not supersede Colorado statutory law. Needs to specifically describe the SOS prescribed duty that Belinda Knisley failed to do. Colorado’s SOS orders required Belinda Knisley to break Colorado statutory law in preserving all election records. The duty Belinda Knisley failed to perform was the erasing of election records that Colorado’s SOS had designed to be erased via the “Trusted Build.”

Question: Who was harmed, Colorado citizens or SOS, Jena Griswold and Dominion Voting Systems?

Belinda Knisley pleaded guilty to trespassing, first-degree official misconduct, and violation of duty, all misdemeanors for testifying against Tina Peters in exchange for having her federal charges removed.

COUNT 13 – FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF SECRETARY OF STATE, C.R.S 1-13-114 (M)

On or about August 9 – August 15, 2021, in Mesa County, State of Colorado, Belinda Knisley, willfully interfered or willfully refused to comply with the rules of the Secretary of State or the Secretary of State’s designated agent in carrying out of the powers and duties proscribed in section 1-1-107, C.R.S, in violation of section 1-13-114, C.R.S.

Prosecution is silent and vague on Colorado’s SOS-specific requirements and exactly what Belinda Knisley failed to perform. Does prosecution understand that SOS “requirements” do not supersede Colorado statutory law? Prosecution needs to specify how Colorado citizens were harmed.

Belinda Knisley pleaded guilty to trespassing, first-degree official misconduct, and violation of duty, all misdemeanors for testifying against Tina Peters in exchange for having her federal charges removed.

References:
(1) John Case’s legal brief titled, Motion For A Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum, IN
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO, Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-
03014-SKC, dated November 27, 2023, pages 6-7.
(2) ibid. page 21.
(3) EXCLUSIVE: Highlights from Tina Peters’ Oct 16 Hearing – Is Judge Varholak Considering Sending Her
Home? By Martel Maxim, Oct 17, 2025
(4) Colorado Jury Unanimously Finds Tina Peters Guilty on Seven of 10 Counts by Rachel Alexander,
August 14, 2024)
(5) APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR BGOND PENDING APPEAL – C.A.R.9(B), Case Number: 2024CA1951,
pages 9-10.

PART 8 – Our Future

The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and suffer for it.  – Proverbs 27:12 (N IV)

The Question – Will a nation reap tyrannical injustice if it’s permitted against the most vulnerable in society?

We were late for the worship service as we met in the parking lot, walking toward the church. She, a busy lady, and I, just there wanting the women’s prayer group to be aware of Tina Peters. After a very brief description, I attempted to hand her the papers to take to the church ladies, but no. She was too busy. She was coming to commune with Christ and had no time for the prayer request of another with political tones. The minister’s sentiments were similar—too spiritual for the wicked politics in our state. The minister never taught that our trampling by the godless was because we isolated our Christ-like preservations from the political world – Matthew 5:13. What is the spiritual condition of any soul or nation that ignores injustice? As one ignores it in the unfair treatment of others, doesn’t that make our conscience and hearts hard and easier to ignore it again, closer to home? How valid is our worship of Christ if our hearts do not match His heart for justice?

The righteous care about justice for the poor, but the wicked have no such concern. – Proverbs 29:7 (NIV)

Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.  – Thomas Jefferson

What does this say about how passionate our zeal for Christ’s gospel (Christian evangelism) and God’s gifts of liberty to us should be? If we fail to preserve liberty, why shouldn’t we lose it?

But if any nation does not listen, I will completely uproot and destroy it, declares the Lord. – Jeremiah 12:17 (NIV)

American tyranny grows because Tina Peters and her evidence of its growth are both ignored. Are you too busy to protect God’s gift of freedom? Then why shouldn’t God permit us to reap what we’ve sown via Level 3 Election Fraud (software-driven) or Insider-designed and controlled voting machines?

A disengaged church has the same effect on society as a raptured church. Why shouldn’t we see last-day scenarios play out now?

Dear American Church, are you awake?

We have seen godless tyrants close churches and Christian schools while bars, casinos, and strip clubs remain open. Job terminations were given to non-conformers of the government’s vaccine pseudoscience, while lives were injured and lost with the experimental vaccine. Societal attitudes by professionals (teachers and college students) celebrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination and social media joyful expressions of young girls at a Christian camp, swept away in last summer’s Texas flash flood, match the German attitude toward Jews once before anyone knew what it would lead to. The FBI spied on Catholics during their worship services, and the US military training listed Evangelicals and Catholics along with the terrorists. Constitutional rights have been denied to Conservatives who questioned the 2020 election or parents who challenge their school boards. Others have been fined and jailed for months without trial. NOW the state can remove children from loving parents who disagree with their school transgender religious promotions via the new HB 25-1312 law. (700 signed up to speak against it, with not quite 70 in support, but it still passed. Does this even look like responsible voting behavior from duly elected representatives fearful of voters’ concerns? If insiders select them, why shouldn’t they be tyrannical?)  Can we see the repeated pattern of denigrating a people before they are imprisoned and killed, as the Germans did in their tyrannical state? New persecutions will include restrictions on “hate” speech. Remember Houston’s Mayor, Annise Parker, who initiated subpoenas of pastors’ sermons? Tina Peters needs medical treatment now. Charlie Kirk was killed instantly. they are slowly killing Tina.

Lord, when did we see you in prison and didn’t help you? In that you ignored the least of these you ignored me and such will go away into eternal punishment.“ (Paraphrased selections from Matthew 25:44-46)

As the American Church fails to secure our elections and fails to increase evangelistic efforts outside our sanctuaries to reach the godless, America will see increased godless tyranny to imprison Conservatives, Christians and anyone else opposing them. Unimaginable freedoms will be removed under the colors of public safety and protections just as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s Live Not by Lies explained.

Let us motivate ourselves to count our own ballots at the precinct level and be Christ’s witness.

Homework: Google Solzhenitsyn’s Live Not by Lies. It’s a short read and understand what’s already here and growing in America as citizens remain disesngaged from their God-given (Jeremiah 29:7) civic responsibilities.

 Bonus LINK: Ten Lessons from the suffering of Richard Wurmbrand with remembrance of Tina Peters from Dr. David Clements

PART 9 – ACTION ITEMS:   (Public input is welcomed and desired.  jerry.kelley428@gmail.com)

• Get Educated with confidence on our National Election Vulnerabilities. Only people aware of problems can fix them. See the free resources mentioned in the Evidence section above.  Tell others what you know or direct them to truthful sources. This is a national problem. Those who mistakenly think this is only a Colorado problem, must watch “Let My People Go” and Nation State Vulnerability Expert, Jeff Lenberg in the Censored Documentaries box on homepage at CensoredEvidence.org. Level 3 Election Fraud (software-driven) is in multiple states.
• Pray for wisdom, courage, and stamina. Is your church praying?
• Keep telling somebody until fixed. Please copy anything (links/essays) from this website to emails, letters, flyers, doorhangers, etc., to anyone in America and other websites, as this fraud continues to grow nationally.
• Help with legal expenses:
  – tinapeters.us
  – mikelindelllegaldefensefund.com
  – https://www.givesendgo.com/ProfessorDavidClements/donate
  – Organize to hold the state criminal responsible.
• Organize and mobilize for bipartisan ballot hand counting and needed legal actions.
  Go to causeofamerica.org
  Handcountroadshow.org
  Handcountroadshow.org/solution
  NOTE: Dallas County, Texas largest, is moving toward ballot hand-counting. Why should this surprise anyone? Americans have done this for over 200 years before we accepted voting machines without question.
• Hold all representatives accountable:
  – Letters to county party chairs, commissioners, sheriffs, district attorneys, and representatives to free Tina Peters and for ballot handcounting at the precinct level.  Shame them for their ignorance, criminal silence, and apathy. Conditions suggest some are ignorant and some are cowards. Letters from all over the country, doubting their legitimacy in office, unless they take action, will have an effect.
• Contact the DOJ to prosecute Colorado state officials who prosecuted Tina Peters for catching them stealing votes
  DOJ LINK: https://www.justice.gov/contact-us
• Contact FBI to investigate Colorado Election Fraud, Tina Peters accidentally discovered. (see tinapeters.us)
  FBI LINK: https://www.thecountyoffice.com/fbi-office/?bingcust=abdtco
• Hold media (newspapers and radio) accountable:
  Why are they not reporting the complete story? Ask the media why they are silent on the computer scientific evidence of stolen votes and stolen money?
• Churches and civic organizations should sponsor highway billboard signs and websites for promoting Truth. Please feel free to borrow/copy anything from my website to your website or sign.
• All silent candidates on the electronic machine fraud can forever forget donations. Tell them.
  A silent-running candidate will be a silent representative after being elected, too.
• POLITICAL PRISONER TINA PETERS who President Trump calls a National Hero for protecting a Federal Election, needs urgent medical care. She is a zero threat to society (except to those who stole the election and have criminally incarcerated her) was promised to be released on her Birthday, September 11th. She has been coughing since 2 am with no other signs of illness and that is how they found lung cancer initially which resulted in 1/3 of her lung 🫁 being removed. She desperately needs medical treatment, healthy food, a comfortable bed, and the warmth of appropriate blankets and loved ones caring for her.
  URGENT CALL-TO-ACTION:  We cannot allow one more day for Tina’s release. We do not let up until Tina is out! Please call the following: (Polis  is guilty of supporting those involved in this election fraud and needs to be in prison.)
  Governor of Colorado, Jared Polis (Blocking Tina Peters release): Constituent Services: (303) 866-2885; Front Desk: (303) 866-2471Attorney General Pam Bondi (Blocking Tina Peters release):  Office: 202-514-2001
  Department of Justice Main Switchboard: 202-514-2000; Department Comment Line:  202-353-1555Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (Blocking Tina Peters release):  Office:
  Department of Justice Main Switchboard: 202-514-2000;
  Department Comment Line:  202-353-1555(It only took 10 minutes to get thru to a person at the White House)
  White House Phone Number:  (202) 456-1111; White House Switchboard: 202-456-1414
• FBI Field Offices LINK: https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices
  Note: Experts can also be fooled if they rely on the media and fail to verify information. Point them to this website.
• SINFULLY SILENT CHURCHES AND ORGANIZATIONS SHOULD BE SHAMED & WARNED:
• Since we are making public sins of our leaders, let us also show the sins of those who claim to follow Christ:
• 
  We beseech you, brethren, to know them which labor among you… –  Apostle Paul (1 Thessalonians 5:12)
• When truth stumbles, justice is driven back. The Lord looked and was appalled no one intervened.  – Selections from Isaiah 59:14-16 (NIV)
• Is not this the kind of fast (religious activity) I have chosen: to loose the chains of injustice and untie the cords of the yoke, to set the oppressed free and break every yoke? – Isaiah 58:6 (NIV)
• I want you to recall the words spoken in the past by the holy prophets and the command given by our Lord and Savior through your apostles. – 2 Peter 3:2 (NIV) If there are any questions or doubts, have them read American Tyranny and contact me – jerry.kelley428@gmail.com.  They can also see legal aid for churches under the Categories 3 tab if needed. None of this is illegal. Asking church members to pray and know how Satan confuses citizens is a Christian duty.The following organizations and churches have been notified and are aware of the injustice against Tina Peters, yet remain silent. Contact them via postcard, emails and/or call and ask them:
  1. Do they think their silence on this injustice against Tina Peters and the injustice of stolen elections is fair to anyone or pleasing to Christ?
  2. Would they want Christians to remain silent if they were in jail? (If anyone thinks Tina Peters is guilty, ask them to please see what has been hidden from them in the American Tyranny essay above.)
  3. How will Americans know to secure their stolen elections if no one tells them? (If they are ignorant about this, the evidence is in American Tyranny, too.)
  4. Why would they not want to follow the Christian examples of the ministers who influenced our Founding Fathers when they warned of coming British tyranny?
  5. Will you promise to ask your congregation or ladies’ prayer group to pray and help others understand this major problem?
  6. If they ask, what can we do? Give them directions to the action item list above.

  The following organizations are silent, and Christ, who is one with the Father, is appalled at their silence. They will be removed from the shaming list below when they obey Christ:

  –          Focus on the Family: https://www.focusonthefamily.com/, 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459) Mon – Fri: 6am – 8pm (Mountain Time),
  Help@FocusontheFamily.com 8605 Explorer Drive, Colorado Springs, CO 80920-1051

  –          Salem Media Group: https://salemmedia.com/  There are different stations throughout the country. Check with your local station. See
  this link for contacts: https://salemmedia.com/contact-us/

  –          Colson Center: https://colsoncenter.org/ 44180 Riverside Pkwy, Leesburg, VA 20176, +1 703 554 8400  OR
  Email:  olsoncenter@colsoncenter.org, or by phone at (877) 322-5527. Operating hours are 9am-3pm MST OR
  in Colorado Springs via: Email: colsoncenter@colsoncenter.org, (877) 322-5527, P.O. Box 62160 Colorado Springs, CO 80962

• – Pray in Jesus Name Ministries – Chaplain Klingensch email: chaps@prayinjesusname.org
  PO Box 77077, Colorado Springs, CO 80970.   (Since he has “Include prayer requests!” why not ask him to share your prayer request for Tina Peters publicly?)
• –          Most churches in Grand Junction and many in Colorado Springs, ColoradoSpecifics are:Church for all Nations, 6540 Templeton Gap Rd, Colorado Springs, CO 80923, +1 719 591 1800Radiant Church, 4020 Maizeland Rd, Colorado Springs, CO 80909,  +1 719 597 4402Living Hope Church, 640 Manitou Blvd, Colorado Springs, CO 80904,+1 719 473 9436Woodmen Valley Chapel, 290 E WOODMEN RD, COLORADO SPRINGS, (719) 388-5000Calvery Worship Center, 505 Castle Rd, Colorado Springs, CO 80904, +1 719 632 3311Life Church, https://www.life.church/ (They are in multiple locations),  9306 Grand Cordera Pkwy, Colorado Springs, CO 80924, +1 719 662 2421Newsong, P.O. BOX  75818, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80970, Use their website to input a prayer quest. I see no phone number. https://www.newsongcs.com/Please start calling and writing to most Churches in Grand Junction. You may want to ask if they have seen the American Tyranny essay above? If not, then direct them to it, with a promise of a follow-up call.
• next stuff

SUPPORTING LINKS:

Venezuelan Whistle Blower Testimony Exonerates Tina Peters

MASSIVE SCANDLE Unfolds in Colorado Alleging Elections are Rigged & the Cover Up is Real – FREE TINA PETERS NOW!!!

July 2025 Update on Tina Peters from Peter Ticktin, lead attorney (First 15 min of Emerald Robinson’s show)

7/23/2025 (3 min) Federal Court Hears Tina Peters’ Bond Appeal

7/18/2025 – (3 min) NEW CAMPAIGN TO HELP TINA PETERS

Selection Code – A documentary on Tina Peters – A Christian grandmother who accidently caught Colorado’s secretary of state, Jena Griswold, and Dominion Voting System stealing votes in Colorado, reported it, then was trapped in media lies initiated by Jena Griswold with Judge Matthew Barrett censoring Tina’s defense 39 times so that her jury learned nothing of the Level 3 Election fraud (software driven) Tina discovered. The jury only heard the bogus charges against Tina. For Example, Tina was accused of a security breach by Jena. Did Jena overlook Election Rule 20.5.3b which says any Colorado clerk and recorder may have any subject matter expert in a secure voting area, with or without a badge, just so long they are constantly supervised? Tina and her team did this. Yet, Griswold and her prosecuting team only quoted Election Rule 20.5.3a which says only county employees are permitted inside voting secure areas. Be sure to scan to the very bottom video to get the original free documentary.

April 23, 2025 – Pete Santilli with Rev. Dr. Scott Bottoms on Tina Peters at 2:21:45 AND 2:40:15 marks

LINK: (50 min) April 25, 2025 Patrick Byrne on Tina Peters. Note: Election Rule 20.5.3(b) permitted Tina to have any expert, with or without a badge, into the secure elections area, just as long as he/she are constantly supervised. Tina did that. Colorado secretary of state, Jena Griswold, totally ignored this election rule in her email command to Colorado’s clerks and recorders. (When you see what Tina accidently discovered, you will understand why Jena did this.) Prosecution against Tina only cited Election rule 20.5.3(a) which mandated only country employees be in this secure area, per Jena’s email, and totally ignored Election Rule 20.5.3(b) as well. Tina Peters broke no Colorado laws. She disobeyed Jena’s email order that was in opposition to the Election Rule 20.5.3(b) already codified into Colorado Law. Who broke the law – Jena Griswold or Tina Peters?

April 22, 2025 – Colorado was not successful in dismissing the DOJ inquiry about Tina Peters

LINK: To Save Colorado & the US, Tina Peters Must Be Set Free

LINK: Petition to Polis to FREE Tina Peters

LINK: Go to tinapeters.us  (Check out the free documentary “Selection Code” via tab. One-hour very bottom video is the original)  

LINK: Go to letmytinago.us

LINK: Feb 8, 2025 – (9 hours) LET MY TINA GO! Nationwide Call For Tina Peters

LINK: Feb 10, 2025 – Do No Forget About Tina Peters 

LINK: (5 min) Set Her Free – Tina’s Anthem (now on 30 platforms)

Sources: The above story was extracted and integrated from my personal experiences and emails, observing Tina’s trial in Grand Junction, Colorado, and reports readily available from tinapeters.us including the free documentary Selection Code. It includes the three Mesa County forensic reports; March 8, 2022 indictment against Tina Peters; Tina’s declaration; and Tina’s attorney, John Case, November 27, 2023 Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. Its foundation is also built upon scientific information from subject matter experts involved with computers, cybersecurity, and database analysis I have collected and made available at CensoredEvidence.org. Note carefully that both major parties have been cheating electronically in our elections in multiple states.

Final Question: If my favorite candidate can “win” without my vote, did my vote count? Most say no, but one told me, “If that’s what it takes to “win” we’re going to do that, because we know we’re right.” I follow up with just one more question. “Well, if my favorite candidate can “win” without my vote, will they read my letters of concern?”

Tyrants will never take our concerns seriously since there are disagreements inside all parties. A national voting holiday with in-person voting, instead of electronic voting, will eliminate phantom voting, questionable signature verifications, and ensure Americans live in freedom and safety again. Let us do everything we can to remain the government of, by, and for the people.

Reference 1 – Clinton Curtis Testimony:

Go to: tinapeters.us and select free documentary Selection Code tab. Scan down to the bottom video and then scan to the 19 minute and 33 second spot. You may also go to CensoredEvidence.org, select the States tab, then scan down to the Colorado box, then scan down to the free documentary Selection Code and scan to the same time spot.

Reference 2 – Texas Rejects Dominion Voting Systems Letter:

Go to CensoredEvidence.org, select the States tab, then scan to the Texas box, then select the top link.

Or select this link: https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/forms/sysexam/dominion-d-suite-5.5-a.pdf

Reference 3 – Mark Cook’s commentary of Kyle Clark’s interview with Jena Griswold:

Go to CensoredEvidence.org, select the States tab, then the Colorado box. .

Or select this Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBsPnEu8oT0

Some Thoughts for Christians struggling with Moral Dilemmas.

There may be some who believe it is never OK to deceive another. As a general rule, for most of the time, this is absolutely correct. However, if someone hid you from another who wanted to kill you and lied that you left their house already to spare your life, who would not be so grateful for the lie that saved your life? This is exactly what Rahab did to protect Joshua’s spies in Jericho and she’s listed in the genealogy of Christ – Matthew 1:5.  Others did this to protect Jews in Nazi Germany.

Tina Peters has given you a gift to protect your vote. The real moral question is: “Will you be responsible to protect your children and others from godless tyranny and free an unjustly sentenced Christian grandmother from prison or will you remain cowardly silent?”

LINK: February 5, 2025 – Revealing Tina Peters . . . Where Did it Begin – Guest’s Mark Cook & Chris Sky

LINK: More information LINK here – Joe Hoft 12/2/2024 article title, BOMBSHELL EXCLUSIVE: Colorado Officials Persecuting Tina Peters Worked For Dominion

LINK: Dec 23, 2204 (56 min) More on Tina Peters and how citizens are played for fools by voting companies

LINK: (5 min) Tina Peters ‘Light in the Darkness’ and checkout chronology timeline link

PETERS IS A POLITICAL PRISONER

Gov. Jared Polis’ recent decision to deny the federal government’s request to transfer Tina Peters to federal custody raises serious concerns about the treatment of a political figure in Colorado. The governor’s refusal to allow the transfer suggests that he might be apprehensive about Peters providing evidence and testimony related to alleged fraudulent elections in Mesa County.

If Polis and Jena Griswold, the secretary of state, were genuinely committed to upholding the “gold standard” of Colorado elections, they should have promptly investigated Peters’ claims by engaging an independent third party to audit the elections in question and thoroughly examine her allegations. Instead, they relied on statements from the election equipment vendor and compromised members of the Colorado County Clerks Association and subsequently pursued criminal charges against her.

During Peters’ trial, Judge Barrett’s decision to deny her 14th Amendment rights to a fair trial by preventing her from presenting her evidence, including the federal and Colorado statutes that required her to retain election data for a minimum of 22 months, further undermines the integrity of the legal process.

Recent revelations from Venezuelan whistleblowers, who testified under oath that U.S. voting machines are controlled from Serbia during elections and have up to 14 methods to manipulate results, lend credence to the concerns raised by Peters. This might be the underlying reason for Polis’ decision to deny her transfer to federal custody.

It is crucial that the truth continues to be uncovered, and that the integrity of Colorado’s elections be maintained. A thorough, independent investigation into these allegations is necessary to ensure transparency and restore public trust in the electoral process.

Nancy Murray Colorado Springs

Col. Shawn Smith’s brief tutorials (from 5 to 11 minutes) quickly explain what anyone can read from the Executive Summaries of any of the reports found at tinapeters.us under “Reports/Filings” tab or at mesamadness.com or on this site in the Colorado box under the “States” tab or at handcountroadshow.org and select “Get Educated” tab, then scan down and select “Colorado” box, then slide over to “Mesa County Reports.”

(5 min) Elections 101: What are the Mesa Reports?  Col. Smith’s work is outstanding. Unfortunately, he makes one mistake at the 4 min 38 sec mark by claiming Peters was lawfully prohibited from saving EMS data. In reality, Tina Peters broke no laws. However, SB22-153 was created in the 2022 Colorado Legislature Regular Session. Section 11 now prohibits all Colorado clerks and recorders from performing a Tina-Peters-like full backup, which was previously legal.

(7 min) Elections 101: Summary of Mesa Report #1

(4 min 51 sec) Elections 101: The Mesa Reports: Caveats for Context

(11 min) Elections 101: Summary of Mesa Report #2

(7 min 47 sec) Elections 101: Summary of Mesa Report #3

(9 min) Elections 101: Summary of Mesa Report #4

(2 min 21 sec) Elections 101: The Significance of the Mesa Reports

See also CauseOfAmerica.org

Abstract: Texas rejected Dominion Voting Systems (DVS) due to ease of vote manipulation. Colorado uses DVS in 62 of 64 counties and was caught stealing votes and erasing this crime. Colorado’s Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, immediately initiated propaganda and lawfare against the county clerk who accidently caught this crime. An innocent Christian grandmother, with an impeccable civic record, now sits with an unjust 9-year prison sentence in a Colorado prison. Proposed civic responses follow.

Question: Will you be the voice for the vulnerable, defenseless, and voiceless (Proverbs 31:8) who tried to protect your vote?

1) Texas report, signed by Deputy Secretary of State Josea A Esparza, dated January 24, 2020, rejected Dominion voting systems, stating: “Dominion was not safe from fraudulent and unauthorized manipulation.”

2) Dominion is used in 62 of Colorado’s 64 counties, and Tina Peters accidentally caught Secretary of State (SOS), Jena Griswold, and Dominion stealing and manipulating votes and then erasing this criminal action via their software upgrade called “Trusted Build.” See 2-page Executive Summary of Report #3 at tinapeters.us (go to “Reports/Filings” tab) or CensoredEvidence.org, then select the “States” tab, scan down to “Colorado.”

3) Tina learned from Dominion and SOS offices that QR codes, needed for election audits and required to be saved for 25 months per state law, were going to be erased via the SOS’s software upgrade called “Trusted Build” and sought help from her own IT department. They either didn’t have the skills for the law-required backups or were already suspicious of the fraud in their office (some were Dominion employees) and refused to help her. Tina then contacted outside technical help that had a top-level government security clearance complete with a background check and had him constantly supervised while he was in the election secure area per Election Rule 20.5.3(b). Tina broke no Election or State rules.

4) Tina submitted her shocking findings of election fraud to the Mesa County commissioners (Janet Rowland, Scott McInnis, Cody Davis) and two weeks later they renewed their contract with Dominion to 2029 anyway. We are just learning of Mesa County government officials that are also Dominion employees and do not have a complete count yet. (Do Colorado citizens want their “elected” officials with money ties and loyalties to any electronic voting company?)

5) SOS, Jena Griswold and other state actors then began media and lawfare against Tina Peters.

Accusing her of:

a) BIOS Passwords Leak. It wasn’t true because the information had been redacted before publication. (Prosecution, Robert Shapiro, and Judge Matthew Barrett would not permit Tina’s jury to see the computer screenshots because the BIOS passwords had been redacted.)  The supposedly “released password” was also rewritten with a new BIOS password in the process of the Secretary of State’s software upgrade called “Trusted Build.” Tina released no active BIOS password. This was a lie promoted by Jena Griswold and others – District Attorney Daniel Rubinstein and Prosecuting Attorney Robert Shapiro.

b) Violating Election Security Protocols. Appears to be true if one only looks at District Attorney Daniel Rubinstein’s Mesa County Grand Jury Indictment #3, referenced on page 9, citing Election Rule 20.5.3(a) that stipulates “county employee” requirements. He purposely omitted Election Rule 20.5.3(b), which permits all clerks and recorders to use outside technical help without background checks or badges, provided they are constantly supervised. Tina’s technical help had a government security clearance except for the “county employment” requirement, but rule (b) overrides that via constant supervision.

6) Subject matter experts, with skills to investigate election crimes, do not typically work in county clerk and recorder offices. SOS, Jena Griswold, made it clear that if any non-county employee were present during their “Trusted Build,” they would simply proceed to the next county. NOTE: This SOS requirement voided Election Rule 20.5.3(b) without legislative approval.

7) Regular Citizen Watchers, who are not county employees, are admitted without background checks or security badges into election secure rooms at even the most critical times of ballot processing.

8) Tina wanted her technical help to observe the SOS and Dominion “Trusted Build” process and was forced to have her technical help use another employee’s badge, so the SOS and Dominion staff would not be tipped off that a non-county employee and subject matter expert was watching them. This is the foundation of DA Rubinstein’s three “Attempt to influence a public servant” claims against Tina Peters.

9) Tina’s defense was blocked on 39 motions, leaving her jury ignorant of her side of the story.

10) Judge Matthew Barrett sentenced Tina Peters to 9 years in prison.

Should Tina Peters be in prison because her technical help wore another county employee’s badge and caught our Secretary of State and Dominion stealing votes in Mesa County’s 2020 General Election and the Grand Junction 2021 Municipal Election, and also caught them erasing their criminal actions via their software upgrade called “Trusted Build”? Evidence is in three reports at tinapeters.us. Go to the “Reports/Filings” tab.

The Nation State Vulnerability Expert, Jeff Lenberg, states that all electronic voting systems are hackable, both with and without internet connections. (Go to the Censored Documentaries box on the homepage of CensoredEvidence.org and listen to this link for just 9 minutes.)

Colorado’s county commissioners, district attorneys, and state representatives are waiting to see if this is a matter of public interest before they take action. Should citizens silently accept insider selections of our representation, public policies, and tax rates? Should a tsunami of protest letters begin to be sent? Imagine if you were in office and a growing public distrust began to develop against you. Would you want to remain in office? Right actions can fix this easily. Will Americans remain the government of, by, and for the people?

More Tina Peters facts can be found under the “The Real News” tab at CensoredEvidence.org. Will you help spread the word?

ACTION 1) Spread the word on Tina Peters, our stolen votes, and our corrupt state officials.

               2) Start petitions to state and national representatives to free Tina and remove our electronic voting systems.

                3) Shouldn’t the media receive complaints from us for their poor journalism, lack of critical analysis, and censorship?

Sincerely,
Jearell (Jerry) Kelley, PE – Former Technical Consultant to the US Space Force (retired)
A former citizen journalist with The Peak News, because our country is still in serious trouble.
Email: Jerry.Kelley428@gmail.com

Dear staff,                                                                                                                                                  July 30, 2024

A Christian lady will be put on trial this month, July, simply because she refused to change her story of finding government corruption, as our secretary of state requested. You know we are living at a time when evil is called “good” and good is called “evil,” (Isaiah 5:20), but what will you do about it?

Question 1: Should Christians participate in government?

Question 2: If Christians find corruption, should they honestly report it?

Question 3: If a Christian reports it, should he/she be left alone to fight the government as government officials attempt to change the narrative, to hide their criminality, and put that Christian in jail instead?

This is Tina Peters’ story. More details are available from the free documentary “[S]election Code” at TinaPeters.us or freetina.com for court dates and activities planned. You may also see the three Mesa County reports that contain the detailed evidence of election fraud from Tina’s website or mine: CensoredEvidence.org. Go to the “States” tab, then the “Colorado” box.

Question 4: Wouldn’t it be encouraging to Tina, if we joined her in her trial either inside or outside the courtroom? What would Christ’s Golden Rule (Matthew 7:12) command us to do?

Question 5: Wouldn’t it be intimidating to those in power that a growing political constituency was becoming aware of their criminality and those protecting them? How will they know we know if we do not participate in person or letters of protest? Even the wicked Kings Saul and Herod were afraid of the people (1 Samuel 15:23 / Matthew 14:5).

Why am I involved? While working as a technical consultant to the US Space Force, I received a Military and Aerospace advertisement for an upcoming cyber security seminar in April 2021. One class was titled: Why We’ll Never Keep the Bad Guys Out. Yes, our “secure” military computers are being hacked. For over four years I’ve collected evidence from subject matter experts, of both major political parties, who confirm massive electronic election fraud is real. Check out the free documentary “Let My People Go” in the “Censored Documentaries” box on the Home page at CensoredEvidence.org for some shocking findings and what some communities are doing about it. You will find more independent testimonies under the Categories 1 tab. The Epoch Times just published “China Had Persistent Access to US, Allied Networks for Years: White House Official.” This is an independent testimony now coming from Israel Soong, a Biden administration official, that our military computers and other systems are being hacked.

Please don’t miss the point. Godless Republicans and godless Democrats are stealing our elections and becoming tyrants over us with very strong anti-Christian hatred against us and public policies following. Question 6: Do you realize innocent Christians have been in American jails for over three years in violation of their Constitutional rights? The attached essay is a story of how early American ministers opposed tyranny. All eyes across our nation will be watching this historical trial in Grand Junction, Colorado. It will also be a historical test of tyranny and the American Christian response to it for our time. What will be recorded of your involvement? Please pray! God knows who can do more. Since faith without works is dead (James 2:26), isn’t prayer without works also dead?

Question 7: Wouldn’t our silence be confirmation of the popular narrative “evil is ‘good’ and good is ‘evil’”?
Question 8: If you remain silent, while Tina goes to jail, why should any Christian participate in government again?

Sincerely,

Jearell C. Kelley, P.E.
Former Technical Consultant to the U.S. Space Force (retired)
Email: jerry.kelley428@gmail.com
PO Box 5791, Colorado Springs, CO 80931

A Follow-up Letter to Silent “Pastors”
By Jerry Kelley – A former citizen journalist with The Peak News (10/28/2024)

Subject: A Christian lady accidently discovered election fraud on a massive scale. She was unjustly tried by state actors and then sentenced with a 9-year prison term while the American Church remains silent.

So, justice is driven back, and righteousness stands at a distance; truth has stumbled in the streets, honesty cannot enter. Truth is nowhere to be found, and whoever shuns evil becomes a prey. The Lord looked and was displeased that there was no justice. He saw that there was no one, he was appalled that there was no one to intervene. Isaiah 59:14-16a (NIV)

Judge Matthew Barrett censored Tina Peters’ defense and only focused on the state’s false charges. Justice was driven back and righteous testimonies were forced to stand silently at a distance. Truth didn’t have a chance to stand in Judge Barrett’s court and popular media censored truth from standing in the streets. Tina Peters, a Christian grandmother and Mesa County clerk and recorder, wanted to shun the evil of erasing QR codes, which are necessary for verifying past elections, but became a prey of a nine-year prison sentence by wicked lawfare from Colorado’s state actors. Why? Tina’s full system backup accidently caught state actors creating unauthorized databases and not transmitting all the votes into them. (It’s the Nation-State Vulnerability Expert, Jeff Lenberg’s Level 3 fraud description no one is talking about and truth falls down again. You can see his link in the Censored Documentaries box on the homepage at CensoredEvidence.org.)

Colorado’s secretary of state instructions, to do a simple backup, only protected the unauthorized databases and the software upgrade called “Trusted Build” erased the criminal evidence of how they were unlawfully created. This election fraud crime happened twice. Once in the Mesa County November 2020 General Election and again in the Grand Junction Municipal April 2021 Election. It’s still in place for 2024 and later elections.

When the sentence for a crime is not quickly carried out, the hearts of the people are filled with schemes to do wrong. Ecclesiastes 8:11 (NIV)

American ministers once spoke against tyranny and motivated Americans to go against the most powerful army and navy in the world for their freedom and independence. Political sermons were once annual pulpit events in many churches with the most popular published for wide distribution. But such truths now stumble in our sanctuaries as ministers proudly say, “We’re not political here.” When does God’s Word not speak on such topics after our Founding Fathers built this nation on biblical principles?

Where there is no revelation, the people cast off restraint; but blessed is he who keeps the law.  Proverbs 29:18 (NIV)

Without this revelation, Christians cast off the restraint of being salt and light in this controversial environment. Why shouldn’t chaos reign as “Christians” left the public square and Satan filled it with his folks? Over 30 million “Christians” do not even vote, because of the mistaken belief “God’s in total control,” while they give full energies to make their careers and vacations come true (Amos 5:14-15; 6:1, 4-7).

The Lord looked and was displeased at injustice and was even more appalled by silent ministers who failed to intervene for fair elections and rescue the punished innocent while the guilty go free. The above attached July 30th letter was sent to fifty-one ministers in the Grand Junction area with prompts to support Tina at her trial, but only one came – www.AppletonChristian.org. Colorado county clerks and recorders now say among themselves, “I don’t want to be Tina-Petered.” So, they do as they are told by Colorado’s tyrannical secretary of state, Jena Griswold, and justice is driven back and righteousness stands at a distance. Now with Colorado’s new law SB22-153 via section 11, no county clerk can do a Tina-Peters-like full system backup and catch future fraud by state actors. Justice is driven back again, because truth is hard to find. Anyone may see the archived trial proceedings at westernslopenow.com and filter for “tina peters.” The scientific forensic evidence of fraud is found at tinapeters.us. Select the “Reports/Filings” tab and read the two-page executive summary of Report #3. Correct convictions fail because truth needs to stand up first. Truth is nowhere to be found by those too busy with the cares of this life to simply read this report. America’s 500,000 ministers could help Americans stand for truth, protect freedoms and ensure fair elections in all states, but ignorance and fear (Rev 21:8) of controversy has them bound. If they could only share truth with Christ-like courage as Christ opposed the civic and religious leaders of his day (Luke 13:31-32; Mark 11:27-33). Now look at what Christ said via the Holy Spirit through Peter to New Testament Christians.

I want you to recall the words spoken in the past by the holy prophets and the command given by our Lord and Savior through your apostles. 2 Peter 3:2 (NIV)

The prophets warned that governments and kings, not founded on God’s laws, are to be resisted (Proverbs 16:12; 25:26; 28:4; Psalms 89:14; 94:16, 20; Jer 5:28-29, 22:16). And Nathan, a godly prophet, took political action for selecting the right king as seen in first Kings chapter one, verse eleven. Even the apostle Paul’s Romans chapter thirteen specified that “the powers that be are ordained of God” were of “rulers [who] are not a terror to good works, but to the evil.” German Christians misread verse one, as many Americans do today, and mistakenly believe anyone in governmental power is God’s choice PERIOD. No wonder Hitler grew in political power and Americans also suffer from godless rulers. If God chose all leaders, Hosea, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, would have never written Hosea 8:4. “You have kings, but not by me.” Americans, initially British citizens, died from British bullets and their homes destroyed by British naval bombardments for over a year under King George III’s tyrannical rule before our Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence. America, with its Constitution and Bill of Rights, would have never come into existence without the ministers who first preached liberty. The British Crown was determined to use its full military power to take away American civic and religious liberties.

Now Americans are on the verge of losing it all due to silent ministers. You can read about it in, The Criminalization of Christianity by Janet L. Folger; Dark Agenda – The War to Destroy Christian America by David Horowitz (a Jew); and Rights and Freedoms in Peril – An Investigative Report on the Left’s Attack on America by Tom Fitton. How does God look at the silent “neutral” American Church?

On the day you stood aloof while strangers carried off his wealth and foreigners entered his gates and cast lots for Jerusalem, you were like one of them. Obadiah 11 (NIV)

Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ Matthew 7:21-23

Is anything more evil than remaining silent (Ezek 33) on evangelism, silent on wickedness and ignoring the suffering innocent (Isa 58:6; 59:16a)? Most “Christians” fail the New Testament example of preaching the Word wherever they go (Acts 8:4). If one isn’t obeying Christ, are they even saved? He (Jesus) became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him (Heb 5:9). But try to explain that to people who think they are fully pleasing Christ and heaven bound.  (See The Real News tab at CensoredEvidence.org.)

(6 min) Link: JUSTICE – The Bible’s Radical View

LINK – Stefanie Lambert on Judge Matthew Barrett’s egregious actions

by Jearell C. Kelley, PE & Former Technical Consultant to the US Space Force (retired)
August 16, 2024

Associated Press writer Colleen Slevin reported that “Judge Matthew Barrett… ruled the defense cannot try to make the case about election integrity or Dominion.” (Note 1) This was obvious to anyone who witnessed his handling of this trial with even the most basic knowledge of cybersecurity issues. Tina’s defense team was immediately and constantly shut down multiple times whenever they got close to these topics with a serious final warning by the judge to defense attorney, Mr. John Case, if he attempted it again.

Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct under Canon 2 states, “A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL THE JUDGE’S ACTIVITIES.” Impropriety is defined as the quality or condition of being improper or incorrectness. Despite the judges’ daily closing instructions to the jury to avoid any social content, it was obvious the judge had already been popular-media programmed or influenced with unscientific conclusions on election integrity or simply biased with incorrectness on this topic as measured against the latest non-partisan scientific research.

Scientific American, November 2018, article titled: The Vulnerabilities of Our Voting Machines, by Jen Schwartz, (Note 2) interviewed J. Alex Halderman who directs the University of Michigan Center for Computing and Society. Professor Halderman was asked, “Over the past decade how has the field of election cybersecurity changed?” He replied, “It has moved away from a position of hubris [“hubris” is defined as excessive pride or over confidence].” (It would be wise if major media drop their mistaken overconfidence too. It’s now obvious to those in the know that major media has not caught up with cyber security science yet. This constant publishing of falsehoods may be intentional. We will later address this.) Halderman continued, “Now that there have been major academic studies there is scientific consensus that [t]here will be vulnerabilities in polling place equipment.” Halderman also warned that “our outmoded and under-tested electronic voting systems are increasingly vulnerable to attacks.”

Professor Halderman added, “To my knowledge, no state has done any kind of rigorous forensics on their voting machines to see whether they had been compromised.” Fortunately, Tina Peters’ accidental discovery of voter manipulation now changes this record Halderman cites. Because Tina did a full backup of the EMS (Election Manage System) before and after Colorado’s Secretary of State “Trusted Build,” Tina discovered vote manipulation. Tina was initially and only concerned with saving QR codes that could potentially be erased. Her backup did not capture how specific voters voted, nor did it capture personal identification information, nor did it expose hacking vulnerabilities as the prosecution tried to convey with their false claim of published “bios passwords.” In truth, as supported by subject matter expert testimonies, no such bios passwords were exposed. And even if they had been, the final instructions of the “Trusted Build” would reset this to new passwords. Why did the prosecution promote such falsehoods? (This too should bring a serious ethics complaint against the prosecution. It was obvious that their deceitful tactics confused the jury.) Dominion is used in 62 of Colorado’s 64 counties. The Colorado Secretary of State’s “Trusted Build” very likely erased this criminal activity of voter manipulation in 61 Colorado counties. It did in Mesa County. Mesa County is the exception because of Tina’s bold action to save election records. Tina’s attorney, John Case, said, “Thank God!” in his closing arguments. But did the jury understand his comment? Answer: Not at all, since all the damning evidence of Colorado Secretary of State’s and Dominion’s criminal actions were completely censored from them by Judge Matthew Barrett.

This connects well to Texas’ decision to prohibit Dominion in their state. The Secretary of State of Texas released a report dated January 24, 2020 signed by Jose A. Esparza, Deputy Secretary of State, explaining why Texas was rejecting Dominion voting machines. The Texas examiner raised concerns of efficiency and accuracy and concluded Dominion was not “safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.” (Note 3)

Why is Colorado using Dominion? Why did Judge Barrett prohibit the evidence of fraud as reported in the three Mesa County forensic reports directly tied to Tina’s case that showed Colorado’s Secretary of State and/or Dominion creating two sets of election books (databases) and did not transmit all the votes to the second database? (Note 4) So, Tina was judged guilty on Count 10 for disobeying Colorado’s Secretary of State orders by permitting a person from the public to witness the “Trusted Build.” If Tina had obeyed, she would have broken Colorado statutory law of failing to preserve election records for 25 months, because Colorado Secretary of State’s “Trusted Build” erased this data. This absurdity shows Tina Peters is guilty either way if one only looks at the procedural “violations” as defined by Colorado’s Secretary of State’s email instructions Judge Barrett only focused on, while Tina would later be discovered at fault if such records were demanded by the public for an audit. Tina, not Colorado Secretary of State, would be the person primarily responsible for the records in her county.

Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct under Canon 3 states, “A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF HIS OR HER OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY with section (1) states, “A judge should be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it. A judge should be unswayed by partisan interest, public clamor, or the fear of criticism. . .”

Judge Barrett was quick to reprimand defense attorney, Mr. John Case’s use of the word “lying,” but completely ignored prosecuting attorney, Mr. Robert Sapiro’s, use of the same word. Is this what an impartial judge does? For the judge to focus on Tina’s resistance to the Secretary of State’s instructions and ignore Tina’s statutory right to manage and preserve elections in her county, showed Judge Barrett’s partisan interest and bias. This showed up again during Sherronna Bishop’s testimony who was also labeled a “Co-Conspirator” without correction by the judge. Again, unashamed open bias by the judge. It was obvious that Sherronna was ready to report on the election anomalies she found in her canvassing that prompted her visits with Tina Peters, but her testimony was immediately shut down by the judge. So let me testify of my canvassing experience.

In April of 2021 I volunteered with the Election Integrity Plan. Our reference was the El Paso County 2020 Voter Registration Data that is publicly available. In my first hour, I was at a very small apartment complex on Nevada avenue in Colorado Springs. Surprisingly, five units did not even exist. I can imagine one or two tenants forgetting what unit they were in, but would five forget and record a non-existent unit number? Are these real voters? My relatively new neighborhood still has most of the original homeowners. Again, referencing the 2020 Voter Registration listing and asking my neighbor down the street if a particular “registered” lady lived at his house, he immediately said, “No, she has never lived here!” Then I met a receptionist at a local business who said her mother lived most of her life in Oklahoma, didn’t know if she ever lived in Colorado, and died over twenty years ago. Somehow, she still got her mother’s ballot for the November 2020 election. Would any of these not be classified as election anomalies and should they be brought to the county clerk and recorder’s attention as Sherronna did with her findings to Tina? Since I was finding these issues so quickly in a random search, isn’t that suggestive that the density of this problem is worse than we realize. This isn’t all I found and reported of phantom voters either. Note: Phantom voters create a margin to use in selecting the ‘right” candidate for those on the inside. This censorship of such evidence by Judge Barrett is prohibited by Canon 3, section (1) as reported above, because such censorship favors partisan interest.

By the way, while we were canvassing, the FBI wanted to prohibit our canvassing and attempted to pressure some states to shut us down. We were also lied about in the media that we were intimidating voters. Tell me, would you be intimidated if you were asked if you had any problems while voting? No one asked how anyone voted, which was another lie promoted by major media. We assured all that we would report any issues they had. Some even thanked us for asking. The FBI messed up again when they discovered that the Russians did hack the 2016 election in a few states, but only reported to election officials in Florida. Shouldn’t every election official in all the affected states know about this? One insider attempted to alert others, but she was charged with leaking classified information and sentenced with a five-year prison term. What did the Russian hackers do? They got into poll registration databases and scrambled the data so poll workers could not verify the identity of registered voters. This forced election workers to fall back on manual methods, which created long lines outside voting precincts, since the election workers had not prepared for this. Voters in all parties, who couldn’t wait to vote, were disenfranchised. [Kill Chain – The Cyber War on America’s Elections has the evidence. (Note 6) The FBI, CIA, and DOJ attempted to publish Trump as a Russian asset, but Mueller, Duran’s reports and Nunes’ findings completely debunked the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, initiated by Hillary Clinton and the DNC.]

I invite the reader to ask the following question and record the answers they collect. Question: If my favorite candidate won by cheating did my vote count? Most said, “No” to me. But one person boldly said, “If cheating is what it takes to win, we’re going to do it, because we know we’re right.” (Note 8) With that I followed up with one more question, “Well, if my favorite candidate can ‘win’ without my vote, will he/she read my letters of concern?” (Note: I did not ask this question while canvassing, only with family, friends and sales people at my front door.)

Tyrants have no need to read any letters of concern from anyone, not even from their own party members. Because Colorado’s Secretary of State had her fingers all over the raiding of Tina’s office, including covering Tina’s office windows so Tina’s aids could not see what the Secretary of State’s team were doing, along with the Judge Barrett completely shutting down the defense’s approach to revealing Tina’s and Sherronna’s motivations, has all the stinking smell of partisan interest. Again, in violation of Canon 3, section (1) as stated above.

Since differences of opinion exist in all political parties, it is hoped that the media promoting confusion and lies on this issue wake up and support full open transparency, before they too are stepped on by the tyrants.

Canon 3, section (4) has, “A judge should accord to every person who is legally interested in a proceeding, or his or her lawyer, full right to be heard according to law, . . .”

Tina’s final and only permitted court comment was, “I have reviewed the case, the purpose of my testimony would be to offer evidence, the court has excluded (it), and therefore I decline.” (This should have been a major red flag to the jurors.) As a witness to Judge Matthew Barrett’s handling of this trial, Tina would not have been permitted to testify of her findings of elections she was responsible for. This is a direct violation to Canon 3, section (4) as cited above. What more evidence must the public have to see that Tina’s trial was completely motivated by partisan interest? The judge openly stated that he believed that she [Tina] was a danger to the community because of the statements she made about the vulnerabilities of the computer voting system. If that’s the case, the judge needs to lock up multiple subject matter experts from the National Academy of Sciences, because they submitted a damning report on the same vulnerabilities titled: “Consensus Study Report” in 2018. (See Tina’s defense attorney, John Case, “Appellant’s Motion For Bond Pending Appeal – C.A.R. 9(b), Case Number: 2024CA1951) None of this was permitted by Judge Matthew Barrett in Tina’s trial.

Just in case the reader missed the latest news, Musk said a massive cyber attack delayed his interview with Trump. (Note 5) Professor Halderman already confirmed this in the Scientific American article cited earlier with, “Over the past 10 years cyber warfare went from something that seemed like science fiction to something you read about almost every day in the newspaper.” (Note 2)

The documentary Kill Chain – The Cyber War on America’s Elections, released in March of 2020, showed a DEFCON hacker wirelessly hacking into a nearby voting machine. The camera went up to the guys standing around the hacked voting machine and it was obvious, they were totally confused. This models our county election clerks’ confusion as well. They wouldn’t know what’s happening either. (Note 6) [I have personally heard Colorado’s Secretary of State in testimony at our Capitol claim that election clerks were in fear for their lives. Those in the know about election fraud are not blaming Colorado clerks, but the secretary of state. Is Jena Griswold pushing another false narrative again?] The DEFCON wireless hacker then reported, “A person can drive by voting places, not look at the voting machines, change the vote and not be discovered, because no paper trail is left.” The Mesa County reports, Tina help generated, revealed 36 wireless devices in the election equipment. Do you honestly think our elections are not also being manipulated? If you want to protect your vote, see what other communities are doing in the free documentary “Let My People Go” in the Censored Documentaries box on the homepage at CensoredEvidence.org. Sheriff Richard Mack’s Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association could also help. (Note 7)

At one point Judge Barrett admitted, “I may not be the brightest person.” Interestingly, we, Tina-trial-observers, had already made that assessment of him that he was in over his head. But it may not be his fault considering major media’s bias and continually bold-face lying on election integrity and Dominion. (Note 8) Why did Judge Matthew Barrett show no curosity, but projected Left-Wing Marxist political bias against Tina all through his court as Rachael Alexander of the Arizona Times described as a “Stalin show trail where only the prosecution gets to put on a case.”

Additional material entered on December 25, 2024 – Judge Matthew Barrett made it clear that the central reason driving his refusal to continue Tina Peters’ bond pending appeal was that he believed she was a danger to the community because of statements she made about the vulnerabilities of computer voting systems. On this basis Judge Barrett should also jail members of the National Academy of Sciences, because they also release multiple similar statements in their 2018 Consensus Study Report. Here’s just one statement from the National Academy of Sciences: “There is no realistic mechanism to fully secure vote casting and tabulation computer systems from cyber threats.”

Notes/References:

1) Associated Press title, “Colorado Clerk who became hero to election conspiracists wanted to preserve data, lawyer says,” by Colleen Slevin, August 1, 2024.

2) Go to CensoredEvidence.org and select the “Categories 1” tab, then the “Independent Testimonies of Election Fraud” box to get access to this Scientific American article.

3) Go to CensoredEvidence.org, select the “States” tab near the top, then scan down to the “Texas” box to get the official Texas report.

4) Go to TinaPeters.us and select the “Reports/Filing” tab for the three forensic reports performed by cyber security experts with decades of cybersecurity, computer and big data analysis experience. Brief resumes Include:

(A) Doug Gould taught Advanced Forensic Techniques to State Law Enforcement, Military and major corporate customers at the World Institute for Security Enhancement.

(B) Jeffrey O’Donnell has over 40 years of computers, full Stack software, database developer and analyst experience. Had developed numerous “big data” analysis systems and is the President of Qest Development, a full-service software consulting and publishing company, and is Chief Information Officer of Ordros Analytics, which specializes in election analytics of all types.

(C) Dr. Walter C. Daugherity is a computer consultant and also Senior Lecturer Emeritus in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University. He graduated from Oklahoma Christian University with a degree in mathematics, and then earned master’s and doctor’s degrees from Harvard University, which he attended on a Prize Fellowship from the National Science Foundation. As a computer expert he has consulted for major national and international firms, and for government agencies. He helped develop the national computer keyboard standard and invented integrated user training within computer applications as well as various electronic computer interfaces.

As a computer science and engineering teacher and researcher, he has published 26 research articles from over $2.8 million in funded research projects, plus conference papers and other publications. He taught many areas of computer science and engineering for 37 years (32 years at Texas A&M University), including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, programming and software design, and cyber-ethics. At Harvard he received the Bowdoin Prize and medal for writing, and in 2015 was named a Distinguished Alumnus of Oklahoma Christian University. He is a life member of the Association for Computing Machinery and American MENSA.

5) The Epoch Times article titled: Musk Says Massive Cyberattack Delayed Trump Interview by Jacob Burg, 8/13/2024

6) Go to CensoredEvidence.org, select Categories 1 tab, then the “Independent Testimonies of Election Fraud” box and scan down for the Kill Chain documentary link. This documentary also showed how the Georgia Republican governor, Brian Kemp, with very high probabilities, stole his position in 2018 and then took the voting machine (ES&S – Election System and Software) personnel into his staff after his “win.” Should we wonder why he “won” again in 2022 with no changes to Georgia’s voting systems?

7) Sheriff Richard Mack – Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association.
Office: 602-268-9268, Cell: 928-432-1879, sheriffmack@hotmail.com, cspoa.org

Sheriff Mack and six other officers won a Supreme Court Case for State Sovereignty (MACK/PRINTZ V. USA) when they were at the same time threatened for arrest if they didn’t go along with the Brady bill. His organization would be great to confiscate fraudulent voting machines. His organization then needs the public’s support.

8) It seems major media have this same problem of lying, cheating, and censoring. The Trump-Russia collusion hoax was debunked. Fifty-one Intelligent agents said Hunter’s Laptop had the marking of Russian disinformation, but later exposed as true. Wuhan lab leak first denied then exposed. Lockdowns and masks don’t work was finally revealed. The fact that Covid vaccines did not stop the spread of Covid was finally published. Ivermectin, with growing evidence of saving lives from Covid death if used early, was finally reported. Reported deaths from Covid vaccines are slowly coming out. Did you know Pfizer wanted to withhold Covid vaccine safety data for 75 years before releasing it to the public, but was overruled by US District Judge Mark Pittman? Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer VP with almost 30 years of drug safety experience, believes 500,000 Americans have died because of the Covid vaccine. Have some Americans become so selfish to protect their positions, money and power that they will lie and censor information to protect their private interest at the expense of others?

LINK: Nov 17, 2024 – APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR BOND PENDING APPEAL – C.A.R. 9(B) (You can see from this document that Judge Matthew Barrett completely censored Tina Peters’ defense and only permitted the government to bring their case against Tina. Citizens must raise awareness of this judge’s bias, if they want to perserve fair courts in their communities.) 

LINK: Mike Davis in a Nov 5, 2024 The Federalist article titled: Judge Throws The Book at 69-Year-Old Tina Peters For Minor Infraction Because She Believes the 2020 Election Was Stolen (Unfortunately, Mike did not know that Tina actually and accidently caught Level 3 Election Fraud)

Colorado’s Tyrannical Secretary of State – Jena Griswold
By Jearell C Kelley, PE & Former technical consultant to the US Space Force (retired)

LINK: July 30, 2025 The Evil of Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold In Her Actions Imprisoning Tina Peters Cannot Be Underestimated

LINK: Mark Cook’s commentary on the Kyle Clark – Jena Griswold Interview is an eye opener. Is Griswold lying?

LINK: Expert reactions to Jena Griswold’s claims. At 17:48 time spot, Clay Parikh explains that if given a BIOS password he can create tools to get back inside and effect the elections database, even after BIOS password changes.

LINK: Government officials persecuting Tina Peters worked for Dominion

Texas’ Secretary of State released a report dated January 24, 2020 and signed by Deputy Secretary of State Jose A Esparza that explained why Texas rejected Dominion voting machines. The reason, Dominion was not “safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.”

Why is Colorado using Dominion? Answer 1: Our Secretary of State and Dominion needs access for vote manipulation.

Proof: Dominion is used in 62 of Colorado’s 64 counties. Tina Peters, an elected Election Clerk in Mesa County until removed by Colorado’s Secretary of State, did a complete system backup of the EMS (Election Management System) before and after Colorado’s Secretary of State’s “Trusted Build” and discovered accidently via three subject matter experts, with decades of professional experience, of a second unauthorized database created and not all votes transferred to the second database. Those that were transferred are not confirmed to have the same original vote-selections either. The insiders can completely manufacture any election results they desire now. Tina also accidently discovered the SOS’s software upgrade called, “Trusted Build” erasing this criminality activity and other election records required by Colorado Statutory Law to be saved for 25 months.

Why is Colorado using Dominion? Answer 2: This fraud has been hidden from the public by a deceived, censoring and lying media for political purposes.

Fraud Evidence:

• Go to TinaPeters.us, click on Reports/Filings tab and see the three Forensic Reports.
• Colorado secretary of state office got caught prompting 30,000 non-citizens to register to vote. See link: “Colorado Caught Trying to Register Illegals to Vote” in the Colorado box under the States tab at CensoredEvidence.org. Jena Griswold also attempted to keep Trump off Colorado’s 2024 ballot.
• In volunteering with publicly available voter registration data in April 2021, I’ve found phantom voters. A few examples are:

1. In my first hour, I was at a very small apartment complex in Colorado Springs. Surprisingly, five units did not exist. I can imagine one or two tenants forgetting what unit they were in, but would five forget and record non-esistent unit numbers? Are these real voters?
2. My relatively new neighborhood still has most of the original homeowners. Referencing the 2020 Voter Registration listing and asking my neighbor if a particular “registered” lady lived at his house, he immediately said, “No, she has never lived here!”
3. Then I met a receptionist at a local business who said her mother lived most of her life in Oklahoma, didn’t know if she ever lived in Colorado, and died over twenty years ago. Somehow, she still got her mother’s ballot for the November 2020 election.

The free documentary “Let My People Go” on the homepage at CensoredEvidence.org shows how phantom votes are manipulating elections and how some citizens are protecting their votes. Citizens must also demand that electronic voting machines and mailed ballots, except to deployed military and the disabled, be removed from Colorado. Our sheriffs should be prompted to remove voting machines and bipartisan citizens employed to count.

Are El Paso County’s Elections Fair?

By Jerry Kelley, Former The Peak News Citizen Journalist (10-28-204)

The free documentary “Let My People Go” shows how Tina Peters’ discovery of election manipulation is in multiple states. Dr. Dave Clements, the producer, wants everyone to see it. It has no royalties for any group size (individual or large groups). I asked Steve Schleiker, the El Paso County Clerk and Recorder, in a private interview if he read Mesa County’s forensic reports, he said, “yes.” When I began pushing for clarity as to their value, he pivoted to the charges against Tina and to the popular media claim that all of Trump’s court challenges failed. Law professor Clements debunks the media’s false claims. Count number 10 against Tina is for disobeying Colorado Secretary of State’s orders of permitting a consultant into Mesa County’s secure area to make backups, which Tina had full authority under Election Rule 20.5.3(b). The Secretary of State’s orders destroyed election records before the 25-month limit in all 62 of 64 counties where Dominion Voting Systems are used. Tina’s actions to perform a so-called “unlawful” backup of the Election Management System (EMS) was only to save these records in her county.

Question number 1: What crime is worse – disobeying Colorado’s Secretary of State orders, which were in violation of Election Rule 20.5.3(b) or complying and destroying election records before the 25-month requirement per Colorado statutory law?

Mesa County Forensic Report #3 proved that unauthorized databases were created and not all votes were transferred into them. Those that were transferred cannot be confirmed to have the original voters’ selections either. These criminal actions are connected to the Colorado Secretary of State and Dominion actions involved this the software upgrade called, “Trusted Build.” Colorado Secretary of State’s order to do a software upgrade, called a “Trusted Build,” destroyed this criminal action. Tina did a full backup before and after this “Trust Build” and accidently caught this election fraud. Steve Schleiker claimed to have read this report.  Any citizen can read these reports. Go to tinapeters.us and select the “Reports/Filings” tab. The 2-page executive summary from report number 3 holds the criminal evidence.

Question 2: Why did Steve deflect to the popular media claims, instead of addressing the Mesa County forensic reports and explain why this is not a problem for El Paso County?

Texas’ Secretary of State released a report dated January 24, 2020 and signed by Deputy Secretary of State Jose A Esparza that explained why Texas rejected Dominion Voting System. The reason, Dominion was not “safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.”

I asked Steve, “Why is Colorado using Dominion?”

He replied, “It’s the law.”

Question 3: Is Steve Schleiker ignoring Colorado statutory law to save election records because of the Colorado Secretary of State’s bogus lawfare against a Mesa County election clerk who did? Tina Peters received a 9-year prison term from a trial in which her defense was constantly shut down on the election fraud she accidently found. You can go to westernslopenow.com, put in, “Tina Peters” in their filter and watch the archived court proceedings.

Associated Press writer Colleen Slevin reported that “Judge Matthew Barrett… ruled the defense cannot try to make the case about election integrity or Dominion.” Consequently, Tina Peters’ defense team was not permitted to show their evidence, which was Tina’s main defense.

In response to Steve’s deflections, I commented, “Steve, your argument is not against me, but the subject matter experts who wrote those forensic reports.” Steve’s immediate response was, “I don’t care!” I was in the process of leaving and almost out the outer door when Steve turned to a staff member and said, “Call security.” I thought clerks and recorders responsibility was to investigate and report fraud. Colorado clerks and recorders now say among themselves, “I don’t want to be tina-petered” Colorado’s clerk and recorders now self-censor to protect themselvews and their jobs. Can you blame them if Colorado citizens remain apathetic and fail to protest these major state crimes?

Question 4: Is it in El Paso citizens best interest to have a clerk and record who doesn’t care about major electronic fraud caught in another county and seems fearful of potential lawfare against him if he/she speaks up?

Question 5: Why did Steve feel so defensive and insecure with my questioning of him?

Question 6: Why did Marxist Judge Matthew Barrett exclude any evidence? Did he not have even an ounce of curiosity?

Question 7: Were there any political connections between Marxist Judge Matthew Barrett and Colorado’s lying criminal Secretary of State, Jena Griswold?

Question 8: Why did Tina Peters receive a 9-year prison term from Marxist Judge Matthew Barrett, especially considering her motive to save election records. This Christian grandmother does not a violent history. She has never received a traffic ticket. Tina had been informed by a Dominion employee and by a Colorado Secretary’s staff person, that QR codes, which are needed to review past elections, would be destroyed with the upcoming software upgrade called a “Trusted Build”? How was Tina to save these records, required by state and federal laws, but not break Colorado’s secretary of state’s order, since Tina’s IT department refuse to help her?

Question 9: Is Colorado’s Secretary of State’s actions an effort to instill fear into Colorado Counties clerk and recorders?

In a public meeting two days after my interview, Steve Schleiker mentioned that his mother always voted in person, while most others use drop boxes. No doubt it is old fashioned to vote in person. However, voting in person could have value.

The documentary “Let My People Go” shows how the bad guys, who are in both major parties, are watching the mail-in and early returns and adjusting toward their designed “win” with phantom voters. It’s best to have your mail-in ballot in your hands when you show up at your precinct. If told you already voted, show them your mail-in ballot and then complete an online criminal report with the sheriff’s office. You can’t do this if you just mail your ballot back or drop it off in a drop box.

Question 10: At that public meeting Steve Schleiker emphasized only what his local team is doing, which is to be applauded, but shouldn’t he be giving El Paso citizens further warnings on how to protect their votes as I just did? Since we “voted” him in, he works for us, not Colorado’s Secretary of State.

Question 11: Since Mesa County reports show this election fraud occurred multiple times and Steve was hesitant to talk about it, should we begin to question if Steve Schleiker was lawfully voted in?

Question 12: Should more citizens read the Mesa County Forensic Reports and file criminal complaints with the sheriff’s online reporting system?

Question 13: Should citizens begin to pass this information to others since major media and our own clerk and recorder isn’t?

Question 14: Should citizens remain silent while an innocent person is sentenced to jail for 9 years?

Christ taught that there will be those who ask him on their judgment day, “Lord, when did we see you  . . . in prison, and did not help you?  Christ answered, “Whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me. Then they will go away to eternal punishment . . . “(Selections from Matthew 25:44-46)

Question 15: Should Church-goers ask why their ministers are silent on civic injustice?

Question 16: Should citizens remain silent when a judge and an El Paso County election clerk-recorder seem more interested in their political positions than protecting the innocent as well as citizens’ votes?

Question 17: If citizens remain silent, should their rights be respected?

Question 18: If citizens fail to pass this warning to others, how are citizens going to protect their votes, rights, free the innocent, and stop wicked lawfare by those in power?

Want more information?

You can see Mesa County Forensic Reports at tinapeters.us and select the “Reports/Filings” tab.

You can see the free documentary “Let My People Go” in the Censored Documentary box on the homepage at CensoredEvidence.org. The massive electronic election fraud evidence starts about the 42-minute mark. You can see the free documentary [S]election Code at tinapeters.us or at CensoredEvidence.org in the Colorado box under the States tab.

Want even more information: Go to CensoredEvidence.org and select The Real News tab.

Mr. Masters,

Please let me see if I got you and Focus on the Family’s position clearly.

A 70-year-old Christian grandmother who accidently caught Level 3 Election fraud (software driven) and reported it to her county commissioners and this prompted Colorado’s secretary of state to do an immediate public press release of lies with Judge Matthew Barrett censoring this grandmother’s defense 39 times so that her jury heard not one bit of the scientific/engineering evidence of the fraud she found or that Texas kicked out Dominion because of fraud, while Dominion is still used in 62 of Colorado’s 64 counties, and you and Focus on the Family are just going to “be watching these developments”?

Christ taught that there will be “followers of his” asking him, “Lord, when did we see you in prison and didn’t help you?” Christ said he will reply, “In that you ignored the least of these, you ignored me and such will go away into eternal punishment” (Matthew 25:44-46).

Speaking though Isaiah, Christ who is one with the Father said, “When truth falls down, so does justice. The Lord looked and was appalled no one intervened” (Selections from Isaiah 59:14-16 NIV).

Speaking through Obadiah, Christ again said, “Because you stood by in your “neutrality” while Jerusalem was attacked, I will judge you as attacking Jerusalem” (Obadiah 11).

Christ speaking via the Holy Spirit to Peter commanded New Testament Christians to “go back and listen to the OT prophets” (2 Peter 3:2). You should now know why.

Christ directly taught to treat others as you want to be treated (Matthew 7:12). Would you want “Christians” to remain silent “watching these developments” play out if you were the one in a Colorado prison with a 9-year unjust prison sentence at the age of 70? Isn’t this likely a life sentence?

Do you honestly think “I’m afraid election law is not one of our specialties here at Focus on the Family” is going to let you off the hook when Christ judges you? Check out the last box titled: “What Pastors & Churches May Do Politically + Helpful Resources” under Categories 3 at CensoredEvidence.org and you will see, we can do much more legally than we think. If we don’t publish the truth, then lies & tyrants win. Who’s going to inform the public, since neither the media, [nor Trump’s EO], nor DOJ, nor Republicans are doing this? Republicans have also been caught in this fraud and they are criminally silent too.

The proof of this fraud, that’s now growing into other states, is a quick read of 2 pages of the Mesa County Report #3 Executive Summary found at tinapeters.us under the “Reports/Filings” tab. Proof of this growing fraud is from many sources, but just see the Nation State Vulnerability Expert, Jeff Lenberg, found in the Censored Documentaries box on the homepage of CensoredEvidence.org for just 9 minutes.

In Christ Service,
Jearell C. Kelley, PE & Former Technical Consultant to the US Space Force (retired)                                              

PS: He (Jesus) became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him. Heb 5:9b (NIV)           

Those who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.
– William Penn (Founder of Pennsylvania)

• Why shouldn’t parents have their children taken away by the godless state now via HB 25-1312, because of our “Christian” non-political involvement?
• Why shouldn’t taxes double and almost triple as they did in Arapahoe County, Colorado, where massive election fraud was also discovered?
• Why shouldn’t Christians come under increasing lawfare that don’t comply to transgender mandatory language in HB 25-1312 despite our Constitutional rights? (I rent to college students and one petitioned his college to go after me even before HB 25-1312, because I didn’t comply with his sinful behavior, forced transgender religion, and language. But the Lord helped me. Will Christ help you when you are attacked by the godless if you remain disobedient to Christ now?)
• Why shouldn’t wicked lawfare become more prevalent against Christians who remain disengaged from this wonderful government God bless us as we disobey him in its maintenance? Seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile. Jeremiah 29:7a (NIV)

Dr. Walter Daugherity, a computer science professor and discoverer of Colorado electronic election fraud, will be at the west steps of Colorado’s capitol on Tuesday, May 27^th at 2:30 to show the massive election fraud discovered in our state.

You can see Dr. Daugherity in the free documentary, Let My People Go in the Censored Documentaries box on the homepage of CensoredEvidenced.org. He is also in the free Selection Code documentary. Scan to 18:47 and 44:48 – minute: second positions. Let My People Go shows how communities are taking back control of their elections. Why are we so ignorant, silent and apathetic?

Question: Will you help by praying and spreading the word?

Here’s an idea: Contact a radio station, media source, or your representative. Ask, “Why are you silent on the massive electronic election fraud evidence being reported by experts from both major political parties?” When subject matter experts report with empirical evidence, we are not talking “conspiracy theories,” but raw scientific/engineering facts. If my favorite candidate can “win” without my vote, will they read my letters of concern? Are we under tyrannical controls now?

Upcoming: Mike Lindell is bringing election fraud evidence to a Colorado court on June 2, 2025. See his link at: mikelindelllegaldefensefund.com

Twelve British Christian men defeated slavery twenty-three years before our Civil War by opposing slavery lies first. Why didn’t Americans learn from the British Christians? Our “Christian” non-political involvement says we still haven’t learned our lesson of Christian political involvement in opposing popular lies as we come under godless state controls. Our Founding Fathers’ ministers opposed tyranny in their sermons and with the Committee of Correspondence. Why are our ministers sinfully silent?

See Phoebe McWilliams at pcmcwilliams@gmail.com  Or me Jerry Kelley at jerry.kelley428@gmail

 Make donations to Tina Peters via tinapeters.us

HandCountRoadShow.org

HandCountRoadShow.org/Solution

Causeofamerica.org

Another Action Option – Lindell Offense Fund

(4 min) Here’s a case of election fraud 13 days after the Nov 5, 2024 General Election